Now selling on Lido Beach, Sarasota, FL
LKR at Lido Beach
1000 Benjamin Franklin Drive, Sarasota
Eight units closed for about $81 million inside twelve days, before the building had a certificate of occupancy of any kind. Fifty-seven of the sixty-five are still on the sponsor's books. The whole record is below.
- Address
- 1000 Benjamin Franklin Drive
- Size
- 65 units, 11 storeys
- Unsold
- 57 of 65
- Median sale
- About $11.75m
At a glance
LKR fast facts
Every figure below is read from the county clerk's recorded instruments, the recorded deeds themselves, the county appraiser's parcel record and certified rate table, the city permit file retrieved in full, the federal flood, coastal and claim records, or the county's hazard layers, with a control behind each result. Where a number cannot be computed from a public record we say so instead of estimating it.
- Record address
- 1000 Benjamin Franklin Drive, Sarasota, FL 34236
- Recorded as
- LKR Condominium
- Size
- 65 units, 11 storeys, one building
- Status
- Substantially complete, on a temporary occupancy certificate
- Full certificate of occupancy
- Never issued, as of this writing
- Sold so far
- 8 of 65, inside twelve days
- Still with the sponsor
- 57 units, about 88 per cent
- Recorded sales
- About $81.1m, median about $11.75m
- Tax rate
- 14.8815 mills, the plain city code
- Flood determinations on this one parcel
- Four, across two zone families
- Regulatory lines crossing the site
- Four, including the coastal construction line
- Evacuation level
- A, a category one zone, 10 foot surge
- Declared build cost
- About $2.28m a unit, the highest in the series
- Price per square foot, and dues
- Not computable from any public record
Not published yet
Location: see 1000 Benjamin Franklin Drive on the map. Get pricing on what is still available. Figures carry the dates shown and are subject to change.
Who built this, and what was here
Five names, three addresses, and a hotel that came down before the permit was a year old
Start with something that sounds trivial and is not, because it is why this building is hard to research. It carries five different names across five official records: one in the state condominium filing, a second in the recorded declaration, a third on the city master permit, a fourth on the approved site plan and a fifth in the city's own pre-application file. None of them is wrong. They are just five.
It carries three addresses too. The tax roll and the recorded deeds give the number this page uses. The city's entire development application file sits under a different number, and searching the city system on the tax roll address returns nothing at all. The state's recorded roll gives the street with no number whatsoever. If you check this building yourself, run both numbers.
The site was a condominium before it was this one, and the sequence is tight. A holdout unit was bought at the start of 2021, the association conveyed in the summer, the termination recorded four days after that, and a demolition permit had already been taken out two weeks earlier. The old building was a Gulf front condominium hotel. This is the third such termination by the same development house that we have documented in this county.
On the sponsor, the recorded file answers a question the state record cannot. It is a Delaware company, manager managed, and an affidavit recorded as a title predicate to the first closing states its authority to convey. That is an ordinary and repeatable source that most people never look at. The wider house runs fourteen filings across three Florida counties, four of them in this one, and it finished a smaller building on Golden Gate Point three months before this one started closing.
One warning that cost real time here and will cost you the same. The clerk indexes this sponsor under two spellings of its own name, each returning twelve instruments, with zero overlap between them. The hyphenated form the state publishes returns nothing at all. The single largest sale in the building, at $14 million, is indexed only under the second spelling. There is a third defect in the same index: the party field is business or surname only, so searching a person by full name returns nothing while the surname alone returns everything.
Take these four to the sales office: the current availability list and what has moved since mid September; the conditions attached to the temporary certificate of occupancy and the expected date of the full one; the unit's own square footage in writing, since no public record holds it; and the association budget with its reserve schedule.
What this actually costs
The cheapest code on the coast, and a $148 million building carried at zero
The tax assumption about barrier islands is wrong here, and it is worth a paragraph. Lido Beach has no millage code of its own. All 1,246 parcels on this street sit in the plain city code at 14.8815 mills across twelve authorities, while Golden Gate Point, a ten block peninsula, has a dedicated code at 16.0862 and St Armands has one too. A Gulf front address pays the cheapest of the city's rates.
On this building's own recorded prices that works out as follows. At the median recorded sale of about $11,750,000 the ad valorem bill is roughly $174,900 a year. The same price inside the Golden Gate Point code would run about $189,000 and inside the downtown improvement district about $198,400, so this address saves roughly $14,200 and $23,500 a year against those two. At the lowest recorded sale the bill is about $80,400 and at the highest about $208,300.
The homestead exemption is close to irrelevant at these values. It saves a flat $591.70 a year at any assessed value at or above $75,000, which is about 0.34 per cent of a bill at the median sale and 0.28 per cent at the highest. The assessment growth cap that travels with it is the part worth having over a decade. The county publishes no per parcel split between the county and school portions, so we computed the saving from the rate table's own school columns.
Now the thing that will surprise anyone who looks up this parcel today. An eleven storey building with a declared construction cost of about $148,073,000, which passed its building final in the summer, sits on the current roll with an improvement value of zero, a new construction value of zero, no year built, no storey height and no living units, at exactly the same value as the year before. The whole 65 unit building is currently taxed as land, at about $395,400 for the year, or roughly $6,100 a unit.
That is a lien date artefact rather than a bargain, and the correction is arithmetic. The roll was struck on the first of January, before a single unit had closed and before the building had any occupancy certificate. Once 65 units land on the next roll at anything near the recorded sale prices, the building's ad valorem bill moves by an order of magnitude. Budget from what units actually traded at, not from what the parcel shows today.
We also cannot give you an assessed to sale ratio for this building, and we are not going to invent one. No unit here has ever been on a tax roll. What can be measured is the street: twelve qualified arm's length resales on Benjamin Franklin Drive in the last year run a median of 75.7 per cent of sale price, in a range from 65.9 to 91.2 per cent. Those are buildings completed between the mid seventies and 1980, so their assessments are market driven rather than construction driven, and that band does not automatically transfer to a new tower.
One line we will not print. Non ad valorem assessments in this county sit behind a tax collector that blocks automated retrieval, so we could not read this parcel's lines. Every figure above is the ad valorem bill only. This county has no ad valorem community development districts at all.
Where the leverage is
Fifty-seven unsold units, two price tiers, and eight comparables already on the record
At this price point most buildings ask you to take the price sheet on faith. Here you do not have to, because eight units have already traded and every price is recited on the face of a recorded deed.
Start with the shape of what sold. Eight units conveyed over twelve days in early September for about $81,050,000. Five of them ran between about $11.7 million and $14 million; three ran between about $5.4 million and $6.5 million. Nothing sold in between, and both tiers opened at the same time. Five of the eight went to trusts or entities and three to individuals.
Then the inventory, which is fully enumerable and is the whole argument. The county has already created all 65 unit addresses: a single unit on the third floor and eight on each floor above it, up to the eleventh. Eight have conveyed, so 57 remain with the sponsor, and nothing further has been recorded. Twelve per cent sold is a launch, not a sell-out.
Compare that to the same house's other finished building and the picture sharpens. On Golden Gate Point this sponsor sold ten of twenty-nine inside thirty-six days and then closed nothing for eleven weeks. Here it is closing units about two and a half times faster per day, at four times the price, in a building with more than twice the inventory. Both buildings are still mostly unsold and both belong to the same house.
That is precisely where representation pays for itself. An agent who knows what all eight recorded sales were, which stack and which floor each sat on, and where the gap between the two price tiers falls, can tell you whether the number you are quoted sits inside the building's own evidence, and can negotiate on a finished unit you have walked through without leaving money on the table. That evidence exists today and almost nobody reads it.
There is also a genuine advantage to buying here rather than at a pre-construction tower. The declaration and the condominium plat are recorded and public, so the unit boundaries, the percentage interests and the governing documents can be read before you make an offer rather than taken from a developer's prospectus. At 65 units the association is also obliged to maintain a website and post its budget, contracts, insurance and inspection reports. That obligation is live now, not at some future turnover.
And one number that is not in your favour, stated plainly. The declared construction cost works out at about $2,278,000 a unit, which is the highest of any building in this series, 57 per cent above the same sponsor's Golden Gate Point tower. The permit also ran 50 months from application to a certificate, against 35.5 months at that building and local benchmarks of 42.9, 59.6, 35.6 and 35.5. Second slowest of six, and the certificate it produced is temporary.
What to get in writing before you make an offer: the current availability list; what the eight recorded sales were, unit by unit; the conditions on the temporary occupancy certificate and the target for the full one; the unit's square footage, since no public record holds it; the association budget and reserve schedule, including the seawall and beach easements; and whether a structural integrity reserve study exists yet.
Fifty-seven units, and eight recorded comparables
Ask what is actually available and what the building's own deeds say it is worth.
The area
Four flood answers on one parcel, four regulatory lines across it, and a postcode it shares with Main Street
This is the most regulated site in the series and we are going to set it out rather than summarise it. Queried at seven points across 645 feet of Gulf frontage, this one parcel returns four different base flood elevations across two zone families: 13 feet at the water's edge, 11 a little inland, 10 in the centre and 9 at the street. The federal and county maps agree with each other at every one of the seven points. Every previous site in this series returned a single answer.
A fifth number appears in the city's own file and matches none of the four. The permit states the design basis using a figure that the federal and county maps do not return anywhere on this parcel. Two official records disagree and we are reporting both rather than choosing. What is not in dispute is the response: the permit sets the bottom of the lowest horizontal structural member at 17 feet, which is four to eight feet of freeboard depending which mapped value you measure from.
Ground elevation does something here that it has not done anywhere else. Seven lidar points run from about 4.7 feet down to below zero at the seaward edge. The buildable body of the site sits between about 4.1 and 4.7 feet, which is the same band as Golden Gate Point and Siesta Key. What is different is that this parcel keeps going down to the waterline.
Four regulatory lines cross this single site, which is a first. The state coastal construction control line runs roughly through the middle of the parcel, about 330 feet in from the Gulf edge, so about the seaward half sits inside state coastal construction jurisdiction. The county's own beach setback line sits a further 160 feet seaward. The wave action line crosses. And the boundary between the two flood zone families runs through it as well. This is the first parcel in the series that the control line, the wave action line or a velocity zone touches at all.
The evacuation answer is the same as the bay side of the city, which surprises people. Level A, a category one zone, modelled for a ten foot surge, identical to Golden Gate Point. On ground of about four and a half feet, a ten foot surge is five to six feet of inundation in the weakest storm that exists. Florida treats a category one surge zone as the coastal high hazard area. One data warning: the county's evacuation coverage stops at the waterline, so the Gulf front test point returns no polygon at all and reads as having no designation. Snap inland before concluding anything.
On federal coastal barrier designation, which affects whether federal flood insurance is available at all, the answer is clean and close. The parcel is not inside any coastal barrier resources unit and not inside an otherwise protected area, so federal flood insurance availability is unaffected. The nearest such boundary sits about 820 feet away. That is the first time in this series the answer has been close enough to be worth saying.
And the postcode claim record comes with a caveat that is itself the finding. This Gulf front island shares a postcode with downtown Main Street, eight blocks inland on ground sixteen feet higher. That postcode has recorded about 1,179 federal flood insurance claims and roughly $108.4 million paid across the life of the programme, with 744 claims and about $100.2 million in 2024 alone. Within that year the September storm that missed produced 514 claims and about $93.7 million against the October landfall's 210 and about $5.0 million, roughly nineteen to one on money. The 2022 hurricane produced eight claims in the whole year.
On who your neighbours will be, we can measure the street but not this building. Across 1,094 condominium units on Benjamin Franklin Drive there are 1,067 distinct owners, the largest single holding is three units, 29.1 per cent are homesteaded and 42.2 per cent are held by entities or trusts. No occupancy figure exists for this building yet and any that is quoted to you is an artefact of an assessment date that preceded every closing. Schools here are Southside Elementary, Booker Middle and Booker High; confirm with the district before you contract.
What you need to know
Buying from a developer with someone on your side
Representation costs you nothing and the timing is the catch: in a developer sales gallery your agent generally has to be with you or named at your very first contact for the registration to stand. Sort it out before you call.
The specific thing to press on here is the occupancy certificate. Eight units closed before this building had any certificate of occupancy, and the one it now holds is temporary, with a short expiry and conditions attached. Ask what those conditions are, what remains outstanding and when the full certificate is expected. The statutory milestone inspection clock does not start until the full certificate issues, and on current law that first inspection would fall thirty years after it.
That thirty is worth a sentence of its own, because it is counter-intuitive. Current law allows a twenty-five year trigger where the local enforcement agency determines that proximity to salt water requires it. No jurisdiction in this county has made that determination, including the barrier island town that would be the likeliest of all. A Gulf front building here gets the same thirty year clock as an inland one. The familiar three mile test people quote was repealed in 2022.
Know what the statute gives you on a developer sale. You are entitled to the condominium documents, and you have a rescission right measured in days from the later of signing or delivery of those documents. Here the declaration is already recorded, so there is no reason to wait for it. Two clocks are already running: the reserve study cycle from the creation of the condominium, and a turnover backstop seven years from recording. With eight units conveyed the owners are two short of the threshold that lets them elect part of the board.
We did not search Florida regulatory enforcement records or civil dockets for any builder, developer, contractor or land-holding entity, so read the absence of any such note as unchecked, not clean. Get an independent inspection of the specific unit before closing even though the building is substantially finished, use the one year window afterwards, and read the limited warranty before you sign.
Subdiview is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by WSR Lido Beach, any homebuilder, any developer of LKR, the City of Sarasota, or Sarasota County. The developer is identified here because it is the developer of record in the state condominium filing and the grantor of record on the recorded deeds, which is a statement of fact and not a representation of any relationship. Community names and marks are the property of their respective owners and are used for identification only. Subdiview is operated by a real estate broker licensed in Illinois. We are not your agent, we do not represent you, and we perform no real estate brokerage services in this state. No one at Subdiview is licensed in this state. If you join an interest list, your information is referred to a real estate professional licensed in the state where the property is located, who will contact you directly. We are compensated by that professional's brokerage, not by you. Pricing, plans, inventory, district, tax, flood and approval details on this page carry the dates shown, are as published, proposed or reported rather than committed, and are subject to change without notice.
Questions and answers
LKR FAQ
Is LKR finished?
Substantially, but not formally. The city's master permit shows the work completed in mid 2026 and a temporary certificate of occupancy issued in September 2026 with a one month expiry and conditions still attached. The field for the full certificate of occupancy is blank, and no full certificate has ever issued. That distinction is not academic: the statutory milestone inspection clock runs from the full certificate, so it has not started, and a temporary certificate is granted on conditions that someone should show you in writing.
How many units are left?
Fifty-seven of sixty-five. Eight units conveyed to third parties over a twelve day stretch in early September 2026 for about $81.1 million in total, at a median of roughly $11,750,000 and a range from about $5.4 million to $14 million. Nothing has been recorded since. So about 88 per cent of the building is still on the sponsor's books, and that is the single most useful number on this page.
How does the pricing break down?
Into two tiers with nothing in between. Of the eight recorded sales, five ran between about $11.7 million and $14 million and three ran between about $5.4 million and $6.5 million. There is no recorded sale anywhere between $6.5 million and $11.7 million, and both tiers opened in the same twelve days. One number we cannot give you is price per square foot: the city's square footage fields on this permit are empty, no unit has ever appeared on a tax roll, and the declaration's unit schedule is a scanned exhibit. Any per square foot figure you are quoted for this building did not come from a public record.
What are the taxes here?
Less than you would expect, and the reason is that Lido Beach has no tax district of its own. All 1,246 parcels on this street sit in the plain city code at 14.8815 mills across twelve authorities, while Golden Gate Point and St Armands each have a dedicated code. At the median recorded sale here that is roughly $174,900 a year, which is about $14,200 a year cheaper than the same price would cost on Golden Gate Point and about $23,500 cheaper than inside the downtown improvement district. The homestead exemption is a flat $591.70, which at these values is about a third of one per cent of the bill.
Is it a flood risk?
It is a Gulf front parcel and the answer is genuinely complicated, which is itself the finding. Queried at seven points across 645 feet of frontage, this one parcel returns four different base flood elevations across two zone families: VE at 13 feet at the water's edge, VE at 11, AE at 10 in the centre and AE at 9 at the street. The federal and county maps agree with each other at every point, which does not always happen. The city's own permit cites a fifth figure that appears on neither map. Against that, the permit sets the bottom of the lowest horizontal structural member at 17 feet, which is four to eight feet of freeboard depending which of the four mapped values you measure from. Anyone quoting you a single flood zone for this address is wrong whichever one they pick.
What else affects the site that I would not think to ask about?
Three recorded title matters. The coastal construction control line runs through the middle of this parcel, roughly 330 feet in from the Gulf edge, so about the seaward half of the site sits inside state coastal construction jurisdiction; the county's own beach setback line sits a further 160 feet seaward of that, and the wave action line crosses too. Two perpetual beach storm damage reduction easements in favour of the city are recorded across the property. And part of the site is filled land over what were formerly navigable waters, which the deeds recite as subject to federal rights in the interest of navigation. None of that is unusual on a barrier island, and all of it is the sort of thing a title search surfaces after you are already in contract.
Before you make an offer
Get your inside track on LKR
We will connect you with a real estate professional licensed in Florida who represents you rather than the seller, who can register you before your first contact with the sales gallery, and who will get you what this page could not: the live availability list and current asking prices, the unit square footages that exist in no public record, the conditions on the temporary occupancy certificate and the date of the full one, the association budget and reserve schedule, and whether a structural integrity reserve study has been completed.
It costs nothing, creates no brokerage relationship by itself, and does not obligate you to anything.