Subdiview

Coming soon on Golden Gate Point, Sarasota, FL

Amara

632 Golden Gate Point, Sarasota

Fifty homes stood here. The sponsor bought all fifty from fifty households, dissolved the condominium and took the buildings down. At 54 units every disclosure right attaches, and the ground sits about four feet below the base flood. The whole record is below.

Address
632 Golden Gate Point
Size
54 units, 9 storeys
Tax rate
16.0862 mills
Flood zone
AE, 8 foot base

At a glance

Amara fast facts

Every figure below is read from the county clerk's recorded instruments, the county appraiser's parcel record and certified rate table, the city permit record including its review tracks, the federal flood and claim files, or the county's hazard layers with a control behind each result. Recorded status was verified at the clerk rather than taken from the state list, which is known to miss recordings in this county.

Record address
632 Golden Gate Point, Sarasota, FL 34236
Filed as
Amara Condo
Size
54 units, 9 storeys, one building
What was here
Fifty homes in six buildings, all demolished
Status
Master permit applied for, still not issued
Tax rate
16.0862 mills across fourteen authorities
Against plain downtown
About $2,578 a year more
Your disclosure rights
All three attach, the best in the series
Flood zone
AE, inside the mapped hazard area
Base flood elevation
8 feet, against ground of about 4
Evacuation level
A, a category one zone, first ordered out
The building next door
Same sponsor, finished, and already selling
Pricing and release dates
Not published yet

Not published yet

Association dues and reserves
Not a public record at any stage

Not published yet

Location: see 632 Golden Gate Point on the map. Figures carry the dates shown and are subject to change.

How this site was assembled

Fifty households, fifty deeds, and a condominium dissolved to make room

Most pre-construction sites are bought as land. This one was not. What stood here was a fifty unit condominium in six two storey buildings, spanning six addresses along the point. The sponsor acquired all fifty units from fifty separate households by fifty separate deeds, thirty-eight of them recorded on a single day, then terminated the condominium. The whole sequence is in the clerk's party index.

The clearance is finished. Demolition of all six buildings was permitted, completed and passed final inspection, and the county roll now carries zero improvement value on about 100,104 square feet. If you walk the address today there is nothing on it.

The building that replaces them is permitted on paper and not yet approved. A master construction permit for 54 units, nine storeys, one building and about 264,578 square feet, at a declared value of $90,000,000, was applied for in the spring of 2025 and eighteen months later has still not been issued. The city files it under two other addresses on the same assembled site, which is worth knowing if you go looking for it yourself.

What is holding it is narrow and specific. Zoning, arborist, public art, plans review, engineering and utilities are all approved. One administrative review has been pending for eighteen months. There are no inspections on the master permit and the most recent plan transmittal is seven months old. Separately, a seawall permit worth about $457,845, covering sheet piles, tiebacks, a raised concrete cap and a dock rebuild, was issued eighteen months ago, has never been inspected and is close to expiry.

Read that as timing information rather than as a verdict. A project that has cleared six of seven review tracks is not a project in trouble. It is a project whose start date is not yet knowable, and your contract's delay provisions are the place that matters.

On who is building it, the state record is thinner than the city's. The state names the filing entity and nothing else. The city's own development applications name the applicant, a Naples house that is the same operation behind three Sarasota county filings from one suite, including the finished building next door and a sixty-five unit building on Lido Beach recorded a month before we looked. That matters because it gives you something rare in pre-construction: a completed building by the same sponsor, on the same street, that you can walk into.

Take these four to the sales office: the issued master permit, once it exists, and the expected construction start; the seawall scope and who carries its cost after turnover; the prospectus, which you are owed at this unit count; and the contract's delay provisions measured against a permit that has sat unissued for a year and a half.

What this actually costs

A third tax code, fourteen authorities, and a roll that lags the market by a third

This peninsula has its own millage code, and it is not the downtown one. Total 16.0862 mills across fourteen named authorities. Plain downtown Sarasota runs 14.8815 across twelve, and the downtown improvement district 16.8815 across thirteen. This address sits between them. Two condominiums a few minutes apart can carry three different rates in the same city.

The difference is in how the city levy is structured here. Downtown the extra district charge is a single flat 2.0000 mills, which is the statutory ceiling taken in full. On this peninsula the city surcharge is two irregular computed lines, 0.6148 of operating and 0.5899 of debt, and it is the only one of the three codes that carries city debt at all. A flat rate is a cap. Computed rates are a budget.

The rest of the bill is the county's usual shape. The school board is the largest single item at 6.0950 mills across three separate lines and 1.89 times the county's own operating levy. The public hospital board takes 1.0420. Mosquito control is a county levy rather than an independent district, which most sources get wrong.

Now the annual figure, and here there are two honest numbers rather than one. On the median assessed value at the sponsor's finished building next door, about $2,140,000, the bill is roughly $34,424. The same unit would be about $31,846 in plain downtown and about $36,126 inside the improvement district, so the peninsula premium against downtown is about $2,578 a year.

But the roll is not the market, and next door proves it. Ten of the 29 units next door sold in the two months before we looked, at a median of about $2,930,000 and about $1,174 a square foot. The assessor carries those same units at roughly 67 per cent of what buyers actually paid. On the real price the first full year is closer to $47,133. Anyone quoting you a tax figure off the property roll for a brand new building is quoting a number a third too low.

The homestead exemption does very little at this price. It saves a flat $651.94 a year in this code at any assessed value at or above $75,000, which is about 1.9 per cent of the bill at the roll median and about 1.4 per cent at the real sale price. The county publishes no per parcel split between the county and school portions, so we computed it from the rate table's own school columns, because the second exemption band does not reach school levies. The method reproduces the downtown figures exactly.

One figure explains the price of everything here. The land alone is carried at about $950,000 per entitled unit, or roughly $512 a square foot, against about $203 a square foot on the sponsor's own parent parcel four doors away. Buying out fifty households one deed at a time is expensive, and that cost sits underneath every unit before a single floor is poured. It is the reason a building here starts where it does rather than where a Rosemary District building starts.

One line we will not print. Non ad valorem assessments in this county sit behind a tax collector that blocks automated retrieval, so we could not read this parcel's lines. Every figure above is the ad valorem bill only. This county has no ad valorem community development districts at all.

The practical version: the tax is computable to the dollar once you use sale prices rather than the roll, and the peninsula premium over downtown is real but modest. The association is the unknown, and on a nine storey bayfront building with a seawall to maintain it is the number that will decide your carrying cost. Get the budget and the reserve schedule in writing.

The compliance clock

No clock has started here, which cuts both ways

Since the Surfside collapse Florida has built a hard timetable around structural inspection and reserve funding, and every condominium sits somewhere on it. This one sits before the start line, and that is worth understanding properly rather than being sold as simply good news.

Start with what 54 units buys you, because it is the best position in this series. More than seven units means the developer must file with the state. More than twenty means you are owed a prospectus before you contract. Twenty-five or more means the association must maintain a website and post its budget, its contracts, its insurance and its inspection reports. At 54 units all three attach. A twelve unit building four blocks from here clears only the first, and its association will never be required to publish anything at all.

The reserve clock has not begun, and neither has turnover. The structural integrity reserve study runs on a ten year cycle from the creation of the condominium, and the turnover backstop runs seven years from the recording of the declaration. Nothing has been recorded, so neither clock exists yet. Compare a sibling on Palm Avenue where both clocks have been running for eighteen months on a building that has not been started.

The flip side is that nothing is readable. Because no declaration exists there are no recorded unit boundaries, no share schedule, no bylaws, no budget with actual rather than projected figures, no reserve study, no inspection history and no resale record. The prospectus is the only binding disclosure and it is the developer's own account of its own project. That is what a buyer cannot see before contracting here.

The turnover finding is the same everywhere and is consistently misunderstood. At turnover the developer must deliver audited financial records, a turnover inspection report and studies covering roof, structure, fireproofing, plumbing, electrical, waterproofing, windows, elevators, heating and cooling, the pool, the pavement and the drainage. Nothing in any of it requires the developer to put money into the reserve. On a bayfront building with a seawall, that gap deserves a direct question.

On the milestone inspection, the rule most people quote has been repealed. Current law sets the first milestone inspection at thirty years from the certificate of occupancy, with twenty-five available only where the local enforcement agency determines that local conditions, including proximity to salt water, require it. The familiar test about being within three miles of the coastline was repealed in 2022, and no City of Sarasota adopting instrument exists in its published code. On a conservative 2029 completion that is a first inspection due by 2059 at the statutory default, or 2054 if the city ever decides. We publish both.

The sponsor's own building next door is the best available guide to timing. It ran 35.6 months from application to certificate of occupancy and 25.0 months from permit issue, which is the fastest of the three local benchmarks, with the same general contractor and 452 logged inspections. That is a real point in this sponsor's favour. The caveat is that this permit has not been issued yet, so the clock has not started.

What to demand in writing before your rescission period closes: the prospectus and every condominium document; the proposed budget with its reserve schedule; the developer's stated position on funding reserves before turnover, specifically for the seawall; the expected turnover date; which milestone trigger the city intends to apply; and the delay provisions of your contract. Your deposit's first ten per cent sits in escrow, and above that the statute lets the developer spend it on construction once work has begun. Here, work has not begun.

Get notified when the master permit is issued

It has been pending for eighteen months on one remaining review.

Join the interest list

The area

Four feet below the base flood, and the postcode caveat does not apply here

This is the most exposed address we have covered in this county, and we are not going to dress it up. The parcel is in zone AE, inside the special flood hazard area, with a base flood elevation of 8 feet against ground of about 4.2 feet, on a panel that took effect in 2024. So the ground sits roughly 3.8 feet below the mapped base flood. Flood insurance is federally required here, not optional.

The wave exposure is real too, and it is mapped. A velocity zone polygon with a base flood elevation of 11 feet intersects the parcel boundary, and the moderate wave action line crosses the parcel. The evacuation level is A, a category one zone, modelled for a 10 foot surge, which makes this the coastal high hazard area on the statutory definition. This is the first address ordered out, in the weakest storm.

The enforcement agency reads it the same way, which is a useful independent check. Permits on this site carry elevation certificate conditions and a federal flood review track. The two downtown sites we have studied, on the same city's permit form, carry neither. When the building department treats two addresses in one city completely differently, that is worth more than any brochure.

On other pages we print a caveat that postcode wide flood claims come from low lying ground rather than from the subject parcel. Here that caveat does not hold. This postcode has recorded about 1,179 federal flood insurance claims and roughly $108.4 million paid across the life of the programme, with 744 claims and about $100.2 million in 2024 alone, which is 92.5 per cent of every dollar ever paid. At 4.2 feet on a bayfront peninsula, this address is squarely in the population those claims came from. Six buildings stood on this ground through both 2024 storms.

Within that year the damage came from the storm that missed rather than the one that landed. The September 2024 storm produced 514 claims and about $93.7 million; the October storm that actually made landfall in this county produced 210 and about $5.0 million. The 2022 hurricane that dominates Florida insurance conversation produced eight claims in this postcode in the whole year.

So state the case for this address accurately. The argument is not that the risk is absent. It is that a nine storey building engineered to the current code, on a site with a rebuilt seawall, is a fundamentally different structure from the fifty year old two storey buildings that were here. Ask what design wind speed and opening protection the plans are sealed to, and what the finished floor elevation is against the 8 foot base flood.

On schools this address produces a fourth distinct combination. It shares its elementary and middle schools with two downtown siblings and its high school with a third, and matches none of them outright. Four buildings within four kilometres have now produced four different school sets. Confirm with the district before you contract.

Ownership next door is the most useful thing on this page about your future neighbours. Of 29 units in the sponsor's finished building, ten sold in the two months before we looked, at a median of about $2,930,000 and about $1,174 a square foot, with no buyer taking more than one unit. Nineteen remain with the sponsor. We deliberately do not quote a homestead rate there, because the roll predates every closing and any figure would be an artefact of the assessment date rather than a fact about who lives in the building.

What you need to know

Buying pre-construction with someone on your side

Representation costs you nothing and the timing is the catch: in a pre-construction sales gallery your agent generally has to be with you or named at your very first contact for the registration to stand. Sort it out before you call.

The case for it here is unusually favourable, which is not something we get to write often. You are owed a prospectus, the association will be required to publish its records, and the sponsor has a finished building on the same street that you can walk into and whose sale prices are public. That is more to work with than any other pre-construction building we have covered. Somebody should be using all three.

Know what the statute gives you. On a developer sale you are entitled to the prospectus and the condominium documents, and you have a rescission right measured in days from the later of signing or delivery of those documents. That window is the most valuable thing you have and it closes quickly. Have someone read the declaration, the budget and the reserve schedule inside it.

On deposits the protection is narrower than most buyers assume. The first ten per cent is held in escrow. Above ten per cent the statute permits the developer to use the money for construction once work has begun, and here the master permit has not even been issued. We did not search Florida regulatory enforcement records or civil dockets for any builder, developer, contractor or land-holding entity, so read the absence of any such note as unchecked, not clean.

The rest is specific to a bayfront building: ask for the finished floor elevation against the 8 foot base flood, the flood insurance position for the building and for your unit, and who carries the seawall in the reserve schedule. Ask what design wind speed and opening protection the plans are sealed to. Get an independent inspection of your unit before closing and use the one year window afterwards. And read the limited warranty before you sign.

Subdiview is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by WSR-550, any homebuilder, any developer of Amara, the City of Sarasota, or Sarasota County. The developer is identified here because it is the developer of record in the state condominium filing, which is a statement of fact and not a representation of any relationship. Community names and marks are the property of their respective owners and are used for identification only. Subdiview is operated by a real estate broker licensed in Illinois. We are not your agent, we do not represent you, and we perform no real estate brokerage services in this state. No one at Subdiview is licensed in this state. If you join an interest list, your information is referred to a real estate professional licensed in the state where the property is located, who will contact you directly. We are compensated by that professional's brokerage, not by you. Pricing, plans, inventory, district, tax, flood and approval details on this page carry the dates shown, are as published, proposed or reported rather than committed, and are subject to change without notice.

Questions and answers

Amara FAQ

What is Amara, and what was on the site before?

It is a planned 54 unit, nine storey condominium at 632 Golden Gate Point on the Golden Gate Point peninsula, filed with the state as Amara Condo, with WSR-550 as the developer of record. What stood here was a fifty unit condominium in six two storey buildings spanning six addresses along the point. The sponsor bought all fifty units from fifty separate households by fifty separate deeds, thirty-eight of them on a single day, then dissolved the condominium and demolished every building. That work is complete and passed final inspection. Nothing stands there now.

Is the new condominium recorded yet?

No, and here we checked rather than trusting the state list. A party search of the county clerk's official records on the condominium's own name returns no instruments at all. We ran controls in the same session: the sponsor's finished building next door returns both a declaration and a recorded plat, and the state roll carries that recording correctly. So the state record and the clerk agree here, and the honest line is not that the state is behind but that this condominium does not legally exist yet.

How many units, and what does that buy me?

Fifty-four, from the master construction permit's own structured fields, along with nine storeys, one building and about 264,578 square feet at a declared value of $90,000,000. At 54 units all three statutory thresholds attach: the developer must file with the state, must deliver a prospectus before you contract, and the association must maintain a website and post its budget, contracts, insurance policies and inspection reports. That is the strongest buyer position of any building we have covered in this county, and it is worth knowing, because a twelve unit building four blocks away gets only the first of the three.

Is construction under way?

Not yet, and the permit record is specific about why. The master permit was applied for in the spring of 2025 and eighteen months later it has still not been issued. Zoning, arborist, public art, plans review, engineering and utilities have all been approved, the utilities track taking eleven months and a full civil disapproval along the way. One administrative review is still pending. There are no inspections on the master permit and the most recent plan transmittal is seven months old. Separately, a seawall permit worth about $457,845 was issued eighteen months ago, has never been inspected, and is close to expiry.

What will a unit cost to own each year?

This parcel carries 16.0862 mills across fourteen authorities, which sits between the two downtown rates. On the median assessed value at the sponsor's finished building next door, about $2,140,000, that is roughly $34,424 a year, against about $31,846 in plain downtown Sarasota and about $36,126 inside the downtown improvement district. But the assessor carries those newly sold units at about 67 per cent of what buyers actually paid, and the median sale price next door is about $2,930,000. On the price people are really paying, the first year is closer to $47,133. Budget from the sale price, not the roll.

What is the flood exposure?

The most serious of any building on this site, and we will not soften it. The parcel is in zone AE, inside the special flood hazard area, with a base flood elevation of 8 feet against ground of about 4.2 feet, on a panel that took effect in 2024. A velocity zone polygon with a base flood elevation of 11 feet intersects the parcel boundary, and the moderate wave action line crosses the parcel. The evacuation level is A, a category one zone, with a 10 foot surge, which is the coastal high hazard area on the statutory definition. The city agrees: permits here carry elevation certificate conditions and a federal flood review track, where the two downtown sites carry neither. Six buildings stood on this ground through both 2024 storms. The argument for this address is not that the risk is absent, it is that the replacement is being engineered against it.

Be first in line

Get on the Amara interest list

We will connect you with a real estate professional licensed in Florida who represents you rather than the seller, who can register you before your first contact with the sales gallery, and who will get you the answers this page could not: the issued master permit and the real construction start, the prospectus and condominium documents, the proposed budget and reserve schedule including the seawall, the finished floor elevation against the base flood, the flood insurance position, and pricing and release timing as soon as they exist.

It costs nothing, creates no brokerage relationship by itself, and does not obligate you to anything.

Joining the interest list is free, creates no brokerage relationship, and does not obligate you to anything. Subdiview is operated by a real estate broker licensed in Illinois and is not licensed in Florida. Your information is referred to a real estate professional licensed in Florida, who will contact you directly and can register you as represented before your first visit to a sales office.