Coming soon on the Quay, Sarasota, FL
555 Quay Commons
the Quay, Sarasota
A twenty storey tower in final inspections with no occupancy certificate and no recorded declaration. And a state filing name that is not a unit count, on land assessed higher per square foot than anything else we have measured in this county. The whole record is below.
- Address
- 555 Quay Commons
- Size
- 78 units, 20 storeys
- Tax rate
- 14.8815 mills
- Evacuation
- Level A
At a glance
555 Quay Commons fast facts
Every figure below is read from the county clerk's recorded instruments, the county appraiser's parcel record and certified rate table, the city permit file retrieved in full across fourteen permits, the federal flood and claim records, or the county's hazard layers, with a control behind each result. Where a figure does not exist in any public record we say so instead of estimating it.
- Record address
- 555 Quay Commons, Sarasota, FL 34236
- Filed with the state as
- Block 78 Condo
- What that name means
- Two master plan block numbers, not a unit count
- Size
- 78 units, 20 storeys, one building
- Status
- In final trade inspections, no occupancy certificate
- Declaration recorded
- No, verified seven ways
- Declared build cost
- About $1.92m a unit, about $410 a square foot
- Inspections logged
- 949, of which 24 failed
- Tax rate
- 14.8815 mills, the plain city code
- Land value carried
- About $584 a square foot, the highest we have measured
- Flood
- Inside the special flood hazard area, base flood 8 feet
- Evacuation level
- A, a category one zone, 10 foot surge
- Unit mix, sizes and parking
- No public record holds them
- Pricing, dues and reserves
- Not published yet
Not published yet
Not published yet
Location: see 555 Quay Commons on the map. Figures carry the dates shown and are subject to change.
Who is building this
The state files it under a name that is not a name, and the marketing name is the one in the sworn record
This is the cleanest example we have found of a state record misleading a careful reader. The condominium is filed with the state under a name that looks exactly like a unit count. It is not. It is two of the Quay master plan's block numbers run together, which the city's own development applications confirm by naming the project after both blocks, and which recorded easements confirm by carrying one of them in their legal descriptions.
What makes it genuinely dangerous is the coincidence. The building really does have 78 units, established independently from five separate city permits and from the assessor's own land line. So the wrong reading and the right number agree, and nothing catches the error unless you go to the permit record. The same sponsor's finished tower a block south is filed under another block number in the same convention.
And the names run the opposite way from usual. The city's master construction permit names this project by its marketing name, in a sworn application. The state filing name appears in no other record anywhere. For once the marketing name is the primary source and the official register is the outlier. A buyer searching the state register by the name on the hoarding will not find this filing.
The site itself was half of one transaction. On a single day in the summer of 2022 a bayfront hotel disposition was split into two tracts conveyed to two entities in the same family: this parcel, and a larger bayfront site a few hundred metres north. The tax roll's legal description for this parcel quotes that very instrument. Unlike its sibling, this one really is a Quay parcel, bound into the master plan by easements running back to 2022.
One more record warning specific to this sponsor. The state prints the developer's name with the words "a Florida limited liability company" appended to it, which only about one filing in a thousand does statewide, so any name based search on the state's string fails against the clerk and the tax roll. The state also gives this entity a mailing city and postcode that contradict its own ten sibling filings and the city's permit record. Neither state address should be used for anything.
Permit volume runs backwards here too, and it is worth knowing. This site, with a nearly finished twenty storey tower on it, carries fourteen permits and two development applications. The sibling site, which is an empty demolition site with a tower permit still in plan review, carries a hundred permits and forty-seven development applications. Counting filings tells you nothing about whether anything is being built.
Take these four to the sales office: the unit mix, unit sizes and parking allocation, none of which exists in any public record; the expected recording date for the declaration, since no chapter 718 clock starts before it; the expected certificate of occupancy against a permit that expires in spring 2027; and the prospectus and condominium documents.
What this actually costs
The smaller half of one purchase pays 57 per cent more tax than the bigger half
The rate itself is the cheaper of the downtown options. Total 14.8815 mills across twelve authorities: the school board at 6.0950 across three lines, the city at 3.2730 plus 0.1348 of debt, the county at 3.2273 plus 0.0667, emergency medical services at 0.7300, the public hospital board at 1.0420, and small lines for water management, mosquito control, a trail debt levy and the inland navigation district. This parcel is outside the downtown improvement district, which would add a flat two mills.
Then the comparison that inverts what we published about the sibling site. This parcel and the larger bayfront site a few hundred metres north were the two halves of one 2022 hotel purchase. This one is carried at about $43,274,400 against the other's $72,895,800, so it is worth 59 per cent as much, and it pays about $644,000 a year against the other's $410,000. Fifty-seven per cent more tax on fifty-nine per cent of the value.
The whole difference is the ten per cent cap on non homestead assessments, and here it is worth nothing. At the sibling parcel the cap is binding and holds about 62 per cent of the site's value off the roll, worth roughly $675,100 a year. At this parcel the just value, the assessed value and the taxable value are the same number in both roll years, so the cap has nothing to bite on. The cap is a feature of a rising assessment, not of Quay bayfront land, and two adjacent parcels from one closing give opposite answers.
On land value this is the most expensive dirt in the series. About $584 a square foot, against about $470 at the sibling site and about $163 on a downtown Main Street site eight blocks inland. Per approved unit it is the cheaper of the two, because it is entitled at about 46 units to the acre against the sibling's 33.
We also recovered the assessor's own pricing formula for this district, which is worth knowing if you ever argue an assessment. The roll values Quay land per approved dwelling unit rather than per square foot. The base is $152,000 a unit, and bayfront parcels carry a view adjustment of 3.65 times that, producing $554,800 a unit here. The arithmetic closes to the dollar with no residual. Two inland Quay parcels carry the base and no adjustment.
On the build cost, the permit is unusually forthcoming. About $149,688,000 declared across roughly 365,400 square feet, which is about $1,919,000 a unit and about $410 a square foot of permitted floor area, and roughly 4,685 square feet of gross floor area per unit before common space is netted out. Adding the land brings declared land and hard cost to about $2,474,000 a unit before soft costs, financing, fit-out and profit. That is not a price and no price exists in any record.
The homestead exemption does very little at this level. It saves a flat $591.70 a year at any assessed value at or above $75,000, which on the median unit at the nearest brand comparable is under one per cent of the bill and on its top unit under half of one per cent. The assessment growth cap that travels with it is the part worth having over a decade. The county publishes no per parcel split between county and school portions, so we computed the saving from the rate table's own school columns.
The practical version: the millage code is the cheaper downtown one and there is no district surcharge here. What you cannot price is the association, and on a twenty storey bayfront tower with a replaced seawall it is the number that will decide your carrying cost. Non ad valorem assessments in this county sit behind a tax collector that blocks automated retrieval, so every figure above is the ad valorem bill only, and this county has no ad valorem community development districts at all.
The compliance clock
A nearly finished building where every statutory clock still reads zero
Since the Surfside collapse Florida has built a hard timetable around structural inspection and reserve funding, and every condominium sits somewhere on it. This one is the strangest position we have covered: physically almost complete, legally still at the start line.
Nothing has been recorded, so nothing has begun. The structural integrity reserve study runs on a ten year cycle from the creation of the condominium, and the turnover backstop runs seven years from the recording of the declaration. We verified the unrecorded status five separate ways and across seven spellings of the sponsor's name, because in this county a single spelling routinely returns a false absence. Until the declaration records there is no association and no share schedule.
What does exist, unusually, is a complete construction record. The city's log holds 949 inspection records on this address of which 24 failed, a failure rate of about 2.5 per cent, with final trade inspections running in recent weeks. The master permit issued about five months after application, the first inspection followed six months after that, and the vertical structure was released in the late summer of 2025. That is a much fuller picture than a pre-construction buyer normally gets.
On unit count you are in a strong statutory position and the numbers are established rather than assumed. At 78 units all three thresholds attach: the developer must file with the state, you are owed a prospectus before you can be held to a contract, and the association must maintain a website and post its budget, contracts, insurance policies and inspection reports. A twelve unit building four blocks away clears only the first and its association will never be required to publish anything.
Here is what a buyer cannot see today, and it is a shorter list than usual. No recorded declaration, so no unit boundaries, no share schedule, no bylaws, no budget with actual figures, no reserve study and no association. No unit mix, no unit sizes and no parking allocation in any public record. The prospectus will be the only binding disclosure and it is the developer's own account of its own project.
The turnover finding is the same everywhere and is consistently misunderstood. At turnover the developer must deliver audited financial records, a turnover inspection report and studies covering roof, structure, fireproofing, plumbing, electrical, waterproofing, windows, elevators, heating and cooling, the pool, the pavement and the drainage. Nothing in any of it requires the developer to put money into the reserve. On a bayfront tower with a seawall that was itself replaced under a separate permit, ask where that seawall sits in the reserve schedule and who carries its cost after turnover.
On the milestone inspection, the rule most people quote has been repealed. Current law sets the first milestone inspection at thirty years from the certificate of occupancy, with twenty-five available only where the local enforcement agency determines that local conditions, including proximity to salt water, require it. The familiar three mile test was repealed in 2022 and appears nowhere in the current section. No jurisdiction in this county has adopted the twenty-five year trigger, including the barrier island town that would be the likeliest of all, and the city's permit system carries no milestone track. Assume thirty from whenever the certificate issues.
What to demand in writing before your rescission period closes: the expected recording date for the declaration and the expected certificate of occupancy; the prospectus and every condominium document; the unit mix, sizes and parking allocation; the proposed budget with its reserve schedule and the seawall's place in it; and the delay provisions of your contract against a permit that expires in spring 2027. Your deposit's first ten per cent sits in escrow, and above that the statute lets the developer spend it on construction once work has begun, which here it plainly has.
Get notified when the declaration records and pricing lands
Neither exists in a public record yet, and the building is already in finals.
The area
The flattest parcel in the series, entirely below its own base flood
For once the flood picture is simple, and the simplicity is the finding. Queried at eleven points spanning the whole parcel, the federal maps return the same answer every time: inside the special flood hazard area with a base flood elevation of eight feet, on a panel that took effect in 2024. The county's own layer agrees at the same coordinates. Two sites in this series returned three and four different answers on a single parcel; this one returns one.
The ground is flat in a way no natural parcel is. Lidar runs 3.8 to 5.6 feet across the site, a spread of under two feet, against four and a half feet on a Palm Avenue parcel and five feet on a Gulf front one. That is engineered fill behind a seawall. And every point of it sits below the eight foot base flood.
The building's answer is in the permit, and it is candid. The permitted finished floor for the garage and commercial level is about 5.5 feet, roughly two and a half feet below base flood, with the first residential floor about ten feet above that. The federal flood review on this permit took five months, the longest of its four review tracks. Ask what flood openings and materials the lower level is built to, and what the finished elevation certificate says.
The evacuation answer is the same as the rest of the bayfront. Level A, a category one zone, modelled for a ten foot surge, at all eleven points including the one at the seawall itself. That is the coastal high hazard area on the statutory definition, and it is the first address ordered out in the weakest storm. One useful data note: the county's evacuation layer usually stops at the waterline and returns nothing at a shoreline point, but it does not do that here, because this parcel's western boundary is a seawall inside the mapped polygon rather than an open shore.
On the postcode claim record the usual caveat applies and is worth stating. This postcode has recorded about 1,179 federal flood insurance claims and roughly $108.4 million paid across the life of the programme, with 744 claims and about $100.2 million in 2024 alone, which is 92.5 per cent of every dollar ever paid. Those claims come from across a postcode that also contains ground sixteen feet higher and a Gulf front island, so they are not attributable to this parcel.
Within that year the damage came from the storm that missed rather than the one that landed. The September 2024 storm produced 514 claims and about $93.7 million here; the October storm that actually made landfall in this county produced 210 and about $5.0 million, so the one that missed out-paid the landfall nearly nineteen to one. The 2022 hurricane that dominates Florida insurance conversation produced eight claims in this postcode in the whole year.
On schools this address matches its bayfront neighbour exactly. The elementary and middle layers return the same kindergarten through eighth campus, so a child here changes buildings once rather than twice, and the high school is a third school again. Eight blocks south, in the same postcode and the same downtown, three entirely different schools apply. Confirm with the district before you contract.
The best read on who buys at this end of the Quay is the two completed towers on the same street. The nearest brand comparable runs 73 units with 67 per cent homesteaded and 73 distinct owners for 73 units, so not one person holds two. The larger tower next to it runs 149 units with 44 per cent homesteaded, 148 distinct owners and a largest single holding of two units, and the sponsor has retained nothing in either. That is close to zero ownership concentration in both, and it inverts the assumption that the more expensive building is the more speculative one.
What you need to know
Buying pre-construction with someone on your side
Representation costs you nothing and the timing is the catch: in a pre-construction sales gallery your agent generally has to be with you or named at your very first contact for the registration to stand. Sort it out before you call.
The case for it here is the gap between what is built and what is recorded. You can see a twenty storey tower and a 949 record inspection log, and you still cannot read a declaration, a share schedule, a budget or a reserve study, because none of them exists yet. A building can be finished and still be a pre-construction purchase in law, and what happens to your deposit and your price if the recording slips is answered in the purchase agreement.
Know what the statute gives you. On a developer sale you are entitled to the prospectus and the condominium documents, and you have a rescission right measured in days from the later of signing or delivery of those documents. That window is the most valuable thing you have and it closes quickly. Have someone read the declaration, the budget and the reserve schedule inside it.
One thing worth knowing about how this city approves towers. This project reached a twenty storey permit through two development applications, both revisions to a master plan approved years earlier rather than new hearings of its own. That is lawful and ordinary here, and it means the hearing record a buyer or a neighbour might want to read belongs to the master plan rather than to this building.
On deposits the protection is narrower than most buyers assume. The first ten per cent is held in escrow. Above ten per cent the statute permits the developer to use the money for construction once work has begun. We did not search Florida regulatory enforcement records or civil dockets for any builder, developer, contractor or land-holding entity, so read the absence of any such note as unchecked, not clean. Get an independent inspection of your unit before closing, use the one year window afterwards, and read the limited warranty before you sign.
Subdiview is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by KT Sarasota South, any homebuilder, any developer of 555 Quay Commons, the City of Sarasota, or Sarasota County. The developer is identified here because it is the developer of record in the state condominium filing and the owner of record in the county property records, which is a statement of fact and not a representation of any relationship. Community names and marks are the property of their respective owners and are used for identification only. Subdiview is operated by a real estate broker licensed in Illinois. We are not your agent, we do not represent you, and we perform no real estate brokerage services in this state. No one at Subdiview is licensed in this state. If you join an interest list, your information is referred to a real estate professional licensed in the state where the property is located, who will contact you directly. We are compensated by that professional's brokerage, not by you. Pricing, plans, inventory, district, tax, flood and approval details on this page carry the dates shown, are as published, proposed or reported rather than committed, and are subject to change without notice.
Questions and answers
555 Quay Commons FAQ
What is 555 Quay Commons, and what does its state filing name mean?
It is a 78 unit, 20 storey condominium tower on the Quay in downtown Sarasota, currently in final trade inspections. The state files it under a name that reads like a unit count and is not one: it is two of the Quay master plan's block numbers run together, which the city's own development applications confirm by naming the project after those two blocks, and which recorded easements confirm by carrying one of them in their legal descriptions. The coincidence that the building genuinely has 78 units makes that misreading almost impossible to catch without the permit record. The city's master permit names the project by its marketing name instead, so on this project the marketing name is the one in the sworn primary record and the state name appears nowhere else.
How far along is it?
Physically, nearly finished. The master permit records 78 units, 20 storeys, one building, about 365,400 square feet and a declared construction value of about $149,688,000, and the city's inspection log holds 949 records of which 24 failed, a failure rate of about 2.5 per cent, with finals running. Legally, though, nothing has started: no certificate of occupancy has issued and the declaration of condominium is not recorded, which we verified five separate ways and across seven spellings of the sponsor's name. Until that declaration records there is no association, no share schedule and no reserve clock.
How long has it taken, and when will it finish?
About 33 months from the master construction permit application, with finals running and nothing recorded. The same sponsor family's own best local figure is about 34 months from permit application to a recorded declaration at a tower a few blocks away, so this project is close to passing its own house record. Local benchmarks across this series run 35.5, 35.6, 42.9 and 59.6 months from application to occupancy, so it is at or inside the fast end of them. The permit expires in spring 2027, which is the only forward looking date in the record and is a regulatory deadline rather than a schedule. We are not going to publish a completion date.
What are the taxes, and why does this site pay more than the bigger one next door?
The parcel sits in the plain city code at 14.8815 mills across twelve authorities, outside the downtown improvement district. The odd part is the comparison: this site and a larger bayfront parcel a few hundred metres away were the two halves of one hotel purchase in 2022, and this one is worth 59 per cent of the other on the assessment roll while paying about 57 per cent more tax, roughly $644,000 a year against $410,000. The reason is the ten per cent annual cap on non homestead assessments. Next door the cap is binding and worth about $675,100 a year. Here the parcel's assessed value equals its just value in both roll years, so the cap has nothing to bite on and is worth exactly nothing. The cap is a feature of a rising assessment, not of Quay land.
Is it in a flood zone?
Yes, uniformly, which is unusual for this series. Queried at eleven points spanning the whole parcel, the federal maps return the same answer every time: inside the special flood hazard area with a base flood elevation of eight feet, on a panel that took effect in 2024, and the county's own layer agrees at the same coordinates. Ground across the site runs a tight 3.8 to 5.6 feet, which is flatter than any other parcel we have measured because it is engineered fill behind a seawall, and every point of it sits below the base flood. The permitted finished floor for the garage and commercial level is about 5.5 feet, roughly two and a half feet below base flood, with the first residential floor about ten feet above that. The federal flood review on this permit took five months, the longest of its four review tracks.
When will the first structural inspection be due?
Thirty years after the certificate of occupancy, whenever that issues. Current law sets the first milestone inspection at thirty years, with twenty five available only where the local enforcement agency determines that local conditions including proximity to salt water require it. The familiar test about being within three miles of the coastline was repealed in 2022. No jurisdiction in this county has adopted the twenty five year trigger, including the barrier island town that would be the likeliest of all, so assume thirty and ask the building official to confirm. If the city ever does make that determination the date moves five years earlier.
Be first in line
Get on the 555 Quay Commons interest list
We will connect you with a real estate professional licensed in Florida who represents you rather than the seller, who can register you before your first contact with the sales gallery, and who will get you the answers this page could not: the unit mix, sizes and parking allocation, the expected recording date for the declaration, the expected certificate of occupancy, the prospectus and condominium documents, the proposed budget and reserve schedule, and pricing and release timing as soon as they exist.
It costs nothing, creates no brokerage relationship by itself, and does not obligate you to anything.