Coming to Sarasota County, FL
3H Ranch
Up to 6,576 homes approved south of Clark Road, in unincorporated Sarasota County
Nothing has been released here yet, so this page is the public record rather than a brochure. Two things in it are worth your time before anyone shows you a floor plan. Getting this approved took sixteen changes to the county's own growth plan, including a countryside buffer that goes to nothing on two sides. And about 41 per cent of this land sits in a flood hazard area today. We have not seen either reported anywhere else.
- Area
- Sarasota County, FL
- Approved
- Up to 6,576
- Acreage
- About 2,727
- Status
- Not yet launched
At a glance
3H Ranch fast facts
What the approval actually says, and what has not been released. Everything in the first column comes from the county's recorded approval documents rather than from marketing, because there is no marketing yet.
- Area
- South of Clark Road, east of I-75, Sarasota County
- Jurisdiction
- Unincorporated Sarasota County
- Developer and builder
- Neal Communities, applicant of record
- Approved for
- Up to 6,576 homes on about 2,727 acres
- Minimum required
- 5,486 homes
- Phases
- Four, across 14 neighbourhoods
- Legal buildout deadline
- End of 2044
- In a flood hazard area
- About 41 percent of the acreage
- Parks required
- At least 140 acres
- Community district
- None exists yet
- Pricing and floor plans
- Not releasedGet notified
- Community name at launch
- Not announcedGet notified
- Model opening date
- Not announcedGet notified
- Which neighbourhood opens first
- Not announcedGet notified
Figures come from the county's recorded approval ordinances and approved master land use plan, from federal and county flood mapping, and from the county property appraiser, all as of September 2026. Phasing is stated on the approved plan as subject to change. Nothing here is a price, an offer, or a release date, because none has been published. All details are subject to change without notice.
Where it is
South of Clark Road and east of Interstate 75, between Ibis Street on the west and Lorraine Road on the east, in unincorporated Sarasota County. The county preserve known as the Pinelands Reserve adjoins it. Drive the area yourself before you commit to anything.
What a local would tell you
Sixteen changes to the county's growth plan, and what each one will feel like from your back door
First, the deal this land sits under. In 2000 the county drew a line around where city services stop. Outside it the default was rural, one house per five or ten acres, which is exactly what this ranch was zoned. Instead of banning growth out there, the county offered a bargain: build at real density, but only as a Village with a walkable mixed-use centre, a genuine mix of housing types, roughly half the land left open, and a wide greenbelt of preserved land so the village reads as a distinct town rather than continuous sprawl. Density in exchange for form, open space and buffers.
Getting 6,576 homes approved here required sixteen separate modifications to the county's development code, plus a separate reduction of required open space from fifty per cent to thirty-three. Individually each is defensible. Together they change the terms. Here is what they mean where you would actually live.
Side setbacks drop to five feet. Two houses can stand ten feet apart, wall to wall. That is a side yard you walk through, not one you use.
The greenbelt goes to zero on two sides. The five-hundred-foot countryside buffer becomes fifty feet along Clark Road, and nothing at all along Lorraine Road on the east and along the southern boundary. Fifty feet is about the depth of one house lot; it is a landscape screen, not a rural edge. On the Lorraine Road side, where the road is being widened to four lanes, there is no buffer requirement whatsoever.
Multifamily height rises from forty-five feet to eighty-five, roughly seven or eight storeys where the baseline was about four. Ask which neighbourhoods, and where they sit relative to the single-family lots.
Sidewalks on one side of the street only, in a plan sold on walkability. And gates and private streets are permitted, in a plan whose whole premise is interconnection.
The easements between houses shrink from five feet to eighteen inches a side, and mechanical equipment may sit eighteen inches off the property line. That is less room to regrade if water pools, and a neighbour's air conditioning compressor a foot and a half from your lot. Screen enclosures also come nearly to the rear line, and three of the fourteen neighbourhoods drop from three housing types to two. One change went the other way and is stricter than the code: the roads get thicker asphalt.
Now the argument, because we would rather give you both sides than a verdict. Opponents pointed out that the underlying zoning permitted 386 homes and the approval permitted 6,576, and argued the modifications set a precedent available to every project outside the line. County planning staff raised objections on open space and buffers. The one dissenting commissioner said it was like putting fifty pounds of building in a five-pound piece of land.
Against that, the developer's case is real and, unusually, it is enforceable. The open space reduction was granted on condition of a net ecological benefit written into the approval as binding minimums: roughly 295 acres of upland habitat creation and 106 acres of pine flatwoods conservation, a hard cap on wetland impacts, a fifty-foot wildlife corridor with animal crossings, grand tree protection, at least 140 acres of parks and a school site. And the honest counterfactual is not open ranch land forever. It is 386 five- and ten-acre ranchettes spread across 2,727 acres with no open space requirement at all, which is precisely the sprawl the 2050 plan was written to prevent. Both of those things are true at the same time.
One more that will not appear in any brochure. Because the community adjoins a county preserve, a notice of proximity must be recorded against every plat and referenced in every deed, and buyers are deemed to have consented to ongoing prescribed burning, pesticide application and heavy machinery on the preserve next door. That is not a defect. It is how a preserve is kept healthy. But you should learn it from us rather than from a smoke plume.
Hear it when the first neighbourhood is filed
That filing is the step that turns this from a planning document into homes you can buy, and it is public the day it lands.
What it will cost, as best anyone can say
No prices exist yet. These are the numbers that will decide your payment anyway.
Flooding first, because it is the biggest unreported fact here. We took the federal flood mapping, clipped it to the actual property boundary rather than a rough box, and then checked the result against the county's own flood layer. They matched to the acre. About 41 per cent of this land, roughly 1,129 acres, sits in a special flood hazard area today, almost all of it the one per cent annual chance zone, with base flood elevations running about seventeen to twenty-eight feet.
Read that in both directions, because the honest version is more useful than the alarming one. This is inland, so it is not coastal storm surge, and those elevations describe shallow water rather than deep. It is also pre-development mapping: lots get filled and raised, stormwater lakes get cut, finished floors are set above the flood elevation, and developers routinely apply to have the maps revised afterwards. But four in ten acres are inside a mapped flood hazard area right now, and that is worth knowing before you fall in love with a lot map. When lots are released, ask for the flood zone, the base flood elevation and the finished floor elevation for your specific lot, in writing.
There is no community district here yet, and that is unusual enough to explain. Most large Florida communities are financed through one, which borrows to build the roads, drainage and amenities and repays it through an annual assessment on every home. None exists for this land as of September 2026. Because the site is larger than 2,500 acres, creating a single district would go to the state rather than the county, so the normal approach is to split it into smaller ones, and you would expect the first petition alongside the first neighbourhood plan. For scale and not prediction: assessments across this region run from roughly $500 to over $6,300 a year, with $2,000 to $4,000 typical for this kind of product, and the developer's own adjacent community carries roughly $40.8 million of district debt across about 1,100 homes. In one regional analysis, two thirds of the properties studied paid more in district assessments than in county property tax.
The land is outside the urban service boundary. All of it. That is the entire point of a Village, so it is not a criticism, but it has a practical consequence: every foot of water main and sewer force main out here is an extension rather than a connection. The approval requires a utility master plan before any neighbourhood plan, and records that adequate service levels are anticipated to be available. It does not name the provider or state a committed capacity. Ask.
One signal about timing that is worth reading plainly. The twelve parcels carry a market value of about $438.7 million and an assessed, taxable value of about $876,000, because the land is classified agricultural. That is entirely lawful and the developer has said so publicly. It is also the cheapest possible way to hold entitled ground, which tells you something about how quickly anyone is in a hurry to build on it.
What to ask for the moment anything is released: whether a community district has been created and its assessment schedule per product type; the flood zone, base flood elevation and finished floor elevation for your specific lot; which neighbourhoods carry the eighty-five-foot multifamily; which are gated; whether your lot backs a zero-width buffer on Lorraine Road or the southern boundary; whether the street has a sidewalk on your side; the recorded notice of proximity to the preserve; who provides water and sewer and whether capacity is committed for your phase; and the school assignment for your specific address in writing.
The area
One road here is finished. The one along the whole northern edge is not funded.
Start with genuinely good news, because it is real and it is done. The interstate interchange at Clark Road has been fully rebuilt as an eight-lane diverging diamond, all ramps reconstructed, at a cost of about $52.6 million. That is the single best piece of infrastructure news attached to this location, and unlike most road promises it is finished.
Now the caveat, which we have not seen anyone else state. Clark Road along this community's entire northern frontage is still two lanes, and its widening is not funded. The state's study of the corridor east of the interstate finished in May 2026 and the design money is in place, but right of way and construction are not in the five-year work programme or in the region's long-range plan. The approved concept is four lanes with multilane roundabouts at four intersections, three of which are access points to this community. Lorraine Road on the eastern boundary is a separate county project, reported at about $57 million to widen and extend, funded through the county sales surtax and a state appropriation, with possible completion around 2028; as of May 2025 the county was still negotiating an agreement with the developer covering about two miles of that work on this property, and we found no record it has been approved. Opponents also flagged Ibis Street on the western boundary: two lanes, no shoulder, and it would serve eight communities.
Worth understanding how the traffic conditions actually work here, because it is not what most buyers assume. The mitigation is largely monitoring rather than construction. The developer must report counts at five intersections every two years and build a signal or roundabout within two years if warrants are met, and the approval states plainly that nothing in it requires the county to build or contribute to any intersection improvement. Neighbourhood-level traffic review is limited to operations, safety and site access rather than corridor capacity.
On schools, the picture is strong and it is worth being precise. Sarasota County schools earned an A for the twenty-third consecutive year, and the boundaries as mapped today put this land in the Skye Ranch K-8 and Riverview High zones. That K-8 school is not a coincidence: it was built on 65 acres carved out of this very ranch, at a cost of about $105.75 million with 1,541 student stations, and it opened in August 2025. The approval also requires a second school site of at least 40 buildable upland acres inside the community, out of the floodplain and sized for a 200,000 square foot school. Two honest caveats: that second site may be relocated to any neighbourhood or dropped entirely if the school board accepts an alternative location nearby, in which case the land becomes housing. And the district rezoned more than a thousand students when the K-8 opened, so run your own address rather than trusting any map, including this paragraph.
On healthcare, be careful, because the nearest facility carrying the hospital system's name on Clark Road is outpatient only, with no emergency room and no inpatient beds. The nearest hospitals with inpatient beds are the system's Sarasota and Venice campuses. There are freestanding emergency rooms at Lakewood Ranch and in North Port, and those are emergency departments rather than hospitals. We found no hospital with inpatient beds announced or permitted in the Clark Road corridor, so do not let a map pin convince you otherwise.
Finally, what 6,576 more homes means for you. Two very large communities already sit on either side of this one, and the county has approved close to 32,000 homes in north county alone under the 2050 framework since 2000. This project would be roughly a fifth of that, delivered by a single company that is both the master developer and the homebuilder. Phase one alone runs to 2030 and full buildout to 2042, with a legal deadline of 2044. For that entire stretch, anyone reselling here competes against the same builder selling brand new homes with incentives, warranties and design centre upgrades on the same land. That is the structural reality of a long-buildout community, and it is sharper here because there are no competing builders to fragment the supply. Buy for the house and the hold, not for a quick resale.
What you need to know
Buying new construction with someone on your side
On new construction the builder already budgets for a buyer's agent whether you bring one or not, so representation costs you nothing. The catch is timing: you usually need your own agent from your very first visit, or the builder will not recognise them and you lose it. On a community that has not opened yet, that is unusually easy to get right, because you can be registered before there is anywhere to walk into.
The developer's record is worth knowing, in both directions. It closed 902 homes on about $574 million in 2025, ranking seventy-first nationally, which is down from 1,212 closings the prior year, a decline of roughly a quarter. That matters on a project of this size only because absorption assumptions matter: 6,576 homes is many years of output for a builder at that volume. In 2018 a citizens group brought two lawsuits against the same developer's adjacent community, arguing the plan amendment promoted urban sprawl and that the rezoning violated open space rules. The project survived both challenges and was built. Worth noting because it is the same objection, on neighbouring land, six years earlier. On the consumer side the company holds an A-plus accredited rating with the Better Business Bureau, with twenty-one complaints closed over three years, twenty of which concerned service or repair rather than sales conduct, which is unremarkable at that volume. We found no documented Florida regulatory enforcement action in public sources, which is an absence of found evidence rather than proof of a clean record.
When this does open, the actionable answer is the same as anywhere: hire your own independent inspector at pre-drywall, again at final walkthrough, and once more before the one-year warranty expires. Read the limited warranty booklet before you sign rather than after. And read what the purchase agreement says about completion timing, price changes before closing, and dispute resolution.
Subdiview is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Neal Communities, any homebuilder, the developer of 3H Ranch, or Sarasota County. The developer is identified here because it is the applicant of record for this community, which is a statement of fact and not a representation of any relationship. Community names and marks are the property of their respective owners and are used for identification only. Subdiview is operated by a real estate broker licensed in Illinois. We are not your agent, we do not represent you, and we perform no real estate brokerage services in this state. No one at Subdiview is licensed in this state. If you join an interest list, your information is referred to a real estate professional licensed in the state where the property is located, who will contact you directly. We are compensated by that professional's brokerage, not by you. Pricing, plans, inventory, district, tax and approval details on this page carry the dates shown, are as published, proposed or reported rather than committed, and are subject to change without notice.
Questions and answers
3H Ranch FAQ
What is 3H Ranch?
3H Ranch is a very large approved but unbuilt community south of Clark Road and east of Interstate 75, in unincorporated Sarasota County. In August 2024 the county commission approved it by a four to one vote as a Village Planned Development: up to 6,576 homes on about 2,727 acres, with 370,000 square feet of office and commercial, across four phases and fourteen neighbourhoods, with a legal buildout deadline at the end of 2044. Worth knowing that 6,576 is the ceiling and there is also a floor: the approval requires a minimum of 5,486 homes. Neal Communities is the applicant of record and would be both the master developer and the homebuilder.
When can I actually buy a home there?
Not soon, and nobody can tell you exactly when. The approved plan targets 2,079 homes in the first phase by 2030, and the plan sheet itself anticipated construction starting in 2025. That did not happen. As of September 2026 no neighbourhood plan has been filed with the county, and a neighbourhood plan is the step everything else hangs off: site plans, plats, the park amenities, the school site, the utility master plan. The land is also still largely owned by the original ranching family rather than the developer, and it is still assessed as agricultural. No community name, no pricing, no floor plans, no model opening date and no sales centre have been published by anyone. The honest answer is that this is early, and the point of getting on a list now is to hear the moment that changes.
What is Sarasota 2050 and why does it matter here?
In 2000 the county drew a line around where city services stop. Inside it, normal growth. Outside it, the default was rural, one house per five or ten acres, which is what this land was zoned. Rather than simply banning growth outside the line, the county offered a bargain: you may build at real density out there, but only as a Village, meaning a compact walkable community with its own mixed-use centre, a genuine mix of housing types, and a wide greenbelt of preserved land separating it from the countryside so villages read as distinct towns instead of continuous sprawl. Roughly half the land had to stay open, higher density had to be earned by buying development rights off land that then gets preserved, and the village had to pay its own way rather than shifting costs onto existing taxpayers. That is the deal. Density in exchange for form, open space, buffers and fiscal discipline. It matters here because getting this approval required changing quite a lot of those terms.
What exactly was changed?
Sixteen modifications to the county's development code, plus a separate reduction in required open space from fifty per cent to thirty-three. The ones you would feel living there: side setbacks drop to five feet, so two houses can stand ten feet apart. The greenbelt drops from five hundred feet to fifty along Clark Road, and to nothing at all along Lorraine Road on the east and along the southern boundary. Multifamily height rises from forty-five feet to eighty-five, roughly seven or eight storeys. Sidewalks are required on one side of the street only. Gates and private streets are permitted, in a plan whose premise is interconnection. Utility and drainage easements between houses shrink from five feet to eighteen inches a side, and a neighbour's air conditioning compressor may sit eighteen inches off your line. Three of the fourteen neighbourhoods drop from three housing types to two. One change went the other way and is stricter: the roads get thicker asphalt.
Is that a scandal, or is it normal?
Neither, and we would rather give you the argument than a verdict. Critics, including a Venice councilmember speaking as a private citizen, pointed out that the underlying zoning allowed 386 homes and the approval allowed 6,576, and argued the modifications would set a precedent available to every project outside the line. County planning staff raised objections on open space and buffers. The dissenting commissioner said it amounted to putting fifty pounds of building in a five-pound piece of land. Against that, the developer's case is real and it is enforceable: the open space reduction was granted conditioned on a net ecological benefit written into the approval as binding minimums, roughly 295 acres of upland habitat creation and 106 acres of pine flatwoods conservation, a cap on wetland impacts, a fifty-foot wildlife corridor with crossings, grand tree protection, at least 140 acres of parks and a school site. And the alternative was 386 ranchettes spread across 2,727 acres with no open space requirement at all, which is precisely the sprawl the 2050 plan was written to prevent. Both of those are true at once.
What about flooding?
This is the number we most want you to have, because we have not seen it reported anywhere. Using the federal flood mapping clipped to the actual property boundary, and cross-checked against the county's own flood layer to the same acre, about 41 per cent of this land sits in a special flood hazard area today, almost all of it the one per cent annual chance zone. Read that carefully in both directions. It is not coastal storm surge; this is inland, and the base flood elevations run roughly seventeen to twenty-eight feet, which means shallow water rather than deep. It is also pre-development mapping: lots get filled and elevated, stormwater lakes get cut, finished floors are set above the flood elevation, and developers apply to have maps revised afterwards. But four in ten acres are in a mapped flood hazard area right now, and when lots are eventually released you should ask for your specific lot's flood zone, its base flood elevation and its finished floor elevation in writing.
Will there be a community district assessment?
Almost certainly, but none exists yet and we will not invent a number. No district has been established for this land as of September 2026. Because the site is larger than 2,500 acres, establishing a single district would go to the state rather than the county, so the usual approach is to split it into smaller districts, and you would expect the first petition to arrive alongside the first neighbourhood plan. For scale rather than prediction: across this region district assessments run from roughly $500 to over $6,300 a year, with $2,000 to $4,000 typical for this kind of product, and in one analysis two thirds of properties studied paid more in district assessments than in county property tax. The developer's own adjacent community carries roughly $40.8 million of district debt across about 1,100 homes. Ask for the assessment schedule in writing before you sign anything.
Be first in line
Get on the 3H Ranch interest list
We will send you what gets released as it gets released: the community name it launches under, the first neighbourhood filing, pricing and floor plans, the lot map and homesite premiums, the community district assessment once one exists, and the model opening date. And we will connect you with a real estate professional licensed in Florida who represents you rather than the seller, and who can register you before your first visit.
It costs nothing, creates no brokerage relationship by itself, and does not obligate you to anything.