Coming soon on the bayfront, Sarasota, FL
1000 Boulevard of the Arts
The former bayfront hotel site, Sarasota
The developer the state names has never held any interest at this address. And this is a downtown address with a barrier island hazard profile, not a downtown one. The whole record is below.
- Address
- 1000 Boulevard of the Arts
- Site
- About 3.5 acres
- Tax rate
- 14.8815 mills
- Evacuation
- Level A
At a glance
1000 Boulevard of the Arts fast facts
Every figure below is read from the county clerk's recorded instruments, the county appraiser's parcel record and certified rate table, the city permit and development application file, the federal flood and claim records, or the county's hazard layers, with a control behind each result. Where a figure does not exist in any public record we say so instead of estimating it, and on this project several do not.
- Record address
- 1000 Boulevard of the Arts, Sarasota, FL 34236
- Filed as
- 1000 Boulevard of the Arts Condo
- What is there now
- The former bayfront hotel, under demolition
- Site
- About three and a half acres on the water
- Status
- Tower permit in plan review, seawall work under way
- Tax rate
- 14.8815 mills, the plain city code
- Downtown improvement district
- Outside it. The CRA it is in adds nothing
- Flood
- Inside the special flood hazard area, base flood 8 feet
- Ground
- Mostly two to three feet below that
- Evacuation level
- A, a category one zone, 10 foot surge
- Schools
- One campus for grades K through 8
- Land value carried
- About $470 a square foot
- Unit count and storeys
- No public record holds either yet
- Pricing, dues and reserves
- Not published yet
Not published yet
Not published yet
Location: see 1000 Boulevard of the Arts on the map. Figures carry the dates shown and are subject to change.
Who is building this
A name on the register that owns nothing, and a half sentence that turns out to be a statute
Start with the thing everyone gets wrong about this filing. The state truncates project names at sixty-three characters, and this one trails off in the middle of a phrase that reads like a description of an unusual ownership structure. It is not. It is a statutory suffix the legislature requires word for word, and it appears identically on fifty-nine filings across Florida. Read those fifty-nine side by side, each cut at a different point, and the whole sentence reassembles itself.
What it does tell you is narrower and worth having. The developer has represented to the state that the residential condominium will be created inside a portion of a building, rather than occupying the whole structure. What is shared, who controls it and how the cost is split are all defined by a declaration that does not exist yet, so nobody can answer them today. The nearest local example of that shape is a tower a few blocks away holding seventy-three residential units alongside two separate commercial parcels.
Now the developer, where the record and the register disagree flatly. The developer of record on the state filing has never held any interest at this address. Its entire county file runs to four instruments, all concerning a commercial unit inside a different tower half a mile away, which it bought in late 2023 and sold to an affiliate nine months later together with that building's developer rights. A search of the county roll for any parcel it owns returns nothing at all.
The land is owned by a sibling entity, and how it was acquired matters more than the Quay association people assume. On a single day in July 2022 one hotel disposition was split into two tracts and conveyed to two entities in the same family: this site, and the site of another condominium a few blocks south. That second parcel's own legal description on the tax roll quotes the very instrument that created it. The relationship to the Quay master development amounts to a single easement recorded four years later.
For what it is worth on track record, the family is real and it finishes buildings. Four separate condominiums in this county and at least eleven across nine Florida counties trace to the same sponsor house. Its one completed Sarasota tower ran about thirty-four months from construction permit application to a recorded declaration, which is at the fast end of the local range. Its other current local project has been running about thirty-three months and is not finished.
One state-record warning to carry into any Florida search you do yourself. The state's recorded roll gives that completed sibling a street address that does not exist: no parcel carries the number, no address point carries it, and no street of that type exists anywhere in the county. It is the third Sarasota project we have found with an impossible state address. Do not take a site address from a state extract.
Take these four to the sales office: which entity will actually be the selling developer and be bound by your contract; the unit count, storey count and construction permit status, none of which is public today; what the condominium will share with the non-residential parcels in the same building and who controls those shared elements; and the current target for the construction permit to issue.
What this actually costs
The cheaper downtown code, and a tax break nobody writes about that is worth 256 times the one everybody does
This parcel is in the plain city code, which is the good news. Total 14.8815 mills across twelve authorities: the school board at 6.0950 across three lines, the city at 3.2730 plus 0.1348 of debt, the county at 3.2273 plus 0.0667, emergency medical services at 0.7300, the public hospital board at 1.0420, and small lines for water management, mosquito control, a trail debt levy and the inland navigation district. Four blocks south the same bill runs 16.8815 inside the downtown improvement district, and the Golden Gate Point peninsula runs 16.0862.
Two downtown designations get confused constantly and only one costs money. This site is inside the downtown community redevelopment area and outside the downtown improvement district. The redevelopment area is a tax increment district, which changes where the money goes and adds nothing to your bill. The improvement district adds two mills. The mapped redevelopment layer carries a currency date well over a decade old, so we report it as a mapped designation rather than a live finding.
Now the number nobody looks at, which dwarfs the one everybody quotes. The site is carried at a just value of about $72,895,800 but assessed and taxed at about $27,530,525, because the ten per cent annual cap on non-homestead property has held it down since the 2022 purchase. Sixty-two per cent of the site's value is currently untaxed, and that cap is worth roughly $675,100 a year. The two mill district surcharge everyone writes about is worth about $2,638 a year on a typical unit. The cap is worth more than two hundred and fifty times that, and it is a holding benefit for whoever owns the land before the units are cut, not a buyer benefit.
On land value, the waterfront premium is stark and measurable. The roll carries this site at about $470 a square foot of land. A downtown Main Street site eight blocks inland is carried at about $163. Bayfront land here is carried at roughly three times downtown land. That is the number underneath every price you will eventually be quoted.
The homestead exemption does not scale and at these values it is close to nothing. It saves a flat $591.70 a year in this code at any assessed value at or above $75,000. On the median unit in the sponsor's own completed tower that is about 3 per cent of the bill; on the top unit in the nearest luxury tower it is 0.46 per cent. The assessment growth cap that travels with it is the part genuinely worth having, and it is a future benefit rather than a first year one.
One more caution about a ratio that gets quoted as a rule of thumb. We have published elsewhere that the assessor carries newly sold units at about two thirds to three quarters of actual sale price. At the sponsor's completed tower here the thirteen resales in the last year run a median of 90 per cent, and one unit is assessed above its sale price. That band is not a constant, it is a function of how many reassessments have happened since the sale. Quote it with the lag attached or it means nothing.
One line we will not print. Non ad valorem assessments in this county sit behind a tax collector that blocks automated retrieval, so we could not read this parcel's lines. Every figure above is the ad valorem bill only. This county has no ad valorem community development districts at all.
The practical version: the millage code here is the cheaper of the downtown options and there is no district surcharge to worry about. The land is expensive, the association budget is unknown, and on a waterfront building with a seawall and a dock to maintain that budget is the number that will decide your carrying cost. Get it and the reserve schedule in writing.
The compliance clock
Nothing has started, and you are entitled to be told that in conspicuous type
Since the Surfside collapse Florida has built a hard timetable around structural inspection and reserve funding, and every condominium sits somewhere on it. This one sits before the start line, and there is a specific consequence of that which works in your favour.
Nothing has been recorded, so no clock exists. The structural integrity reserve study runs on a ten year cycle from the creation of the condominium, and the turnover backstop runs seven years from the recording of the declaration. We verified the unrecorded status four separate ways rather than assuming the state list was simply behind, which it has been on other buildings in this county. The state and the clerk agree here, and that agreement is itself the finding.
Here is the protection most buyers never hear about. The developer's disclosure package must include the most recent milestone inspection report and the most recent structural integrity reserve study, or a statement in conspicuous type that each has not been completed or is not required. At a brand new building the honest answer is that neither exists, and you are entitled to be told so in conspicuous type rather than left to infer it. Ask for that page specifically.
On unit count, the thresholds are the right way to think about it because the number is not public. A residential condominium of more than twenty units owes you a prospectus before you can be held to a contract, and one of twenty-five or more obliges the association to maintain a website and post its budget, contracts, insurance policies and inspection reports. On a three and a half acre bayfront site replacing a full service hotel, clearing both is close to certain, but no primary source establishes it and we are not going to assert it.
The schedule is the honest weak point of this project today. The demolition permit has been pending inspection for about sixteen months and the master construction permit has been in plan review for about eight months without issuing. Six development applications were withdrawn by the applicant inside nineteen months, one construction permit was withdrawn and another cancelled, and two development applications filed in 2024 are still in review while later ones have completed around them. That is not a clean entitlement track, and the completion clock the local benchmarks measure has not started running.
The turnover finding is the same everywhere and is consistently misunderstood. At turnover the developer must deliver audited financial records, a turnover inspection report and studies covering roof, structure, fireproofing, plumbing, electrical, waterproofing, windows, elevators, heating and cooling, the pool, the pavement and the drainage. Nothing in any of it requires the developer to put money into the reserve. On a waterfront building with a seawall and a dock, ask where those sit in the reserve schedule and who carries their cost after turnover.
And here is what a buyer cannot see before contracting, which on this project is most of it. No recorded declaration, so no unit boundaries, no share schedule, no bylaws, no budget with actual figures, no reserve study, no association, no inspection history and no resale record. No unit count, no storey count and no declared construction cost in any reachable record. The prospectus will be the only binding disclosure and it is the developer's own account of its own project.
On the milestone inspection, the rule most people quote has been repealed. Current law sets the first milestone inspection at thirty years from the certificate of occupancy, with twenty-five available only where the local enforcement agency determines that local conditions, including proximity to salt water, require it. The familiar three mile test was repealed in 2022 and appears nowhere in the current section. No Sarasota jurisdiction has been shown to have made that determination, including the barrier island town that would be the likeliest of all to make it, and the city's permit system carries no milestone track at all. Assume thirty and ask the building official to confirm.
What to demand in writing before your rescission period closes: the conspicuous statements about the milestone report and the reserve study; the prospectus and every condominium document; the confirmed unit and storey count; the construction permit status and a current occupancy target; what the residential condominium shares with the other parcels in the building and who controls them; and the delay provisions of your contract. Your deposit's first ten per cent sits in escrow, and above that the statute lets the developer spend it on construction once work has begun.
Get notified when the construction permit issues
It has been in plan review for about eight months, and pricing does not exist until it moves.
The area
Below its own base flood, off the edge of the evacuation map, and a school set nobody else in the series has
The single most important thing on this page is that downtown Sarasota's reputation does not transfer to this address. The federal maps rate this parcel AE, inside the special flood hazard area, with a base flood elevation of eight feet, on a panel effective in 2024, and the county's own layer agrees rather than disagreeing. Eight blocks south, Main Street is outside the special flood hazard area entirely, with no base flood elevation, because the ground there is about sixteen feet higher.
Measured on the ground the site is mostly under its own base flood. Fourteen lidar points clipped to the parcel run from roughly the datum at the water's edge to about fifteen feet at the street, and only one of the fourteen clears eight feet by more than a foot. The bulk of the developable area sits two to three feet below base flood. Whatever gets built here will be engineered up, and the finished floor elevation is the number to ask for.
The evacuation picture matches the barrier islands rather than downtown. Level A, a category one zone, modelled for a ten foot surge, identical to the Golden Gate Point peninsula and nothing like Main Street's level C, category three and eighteen feet. A category one surge zone is the coastal high hazard area on the statutory definition. No velocity zone touches the parcel, though wave action lines are mapped within a few hundred metres and the layer publishes nothing that would tell us which side of them this site sits on.
One quirk in the county data worth knowing if you check this yourself. One of the two official address points for this site returns no evacuation zone at all, because the county's evacuation coverage stops at the shoreline and that point sits over the marina basin. Query a bayfront tower at the wrong point and it reads as having no evacuation designation whatsoever.
On the postcode claim record, this is one of the addresses where the usual caveat does not soften anything. This postcode has recorded about 1,179 federal flood insurance claims and roughly $108.4 million paid across the life of the programme, with 744 claims and about $100.2 million in 2024 alone, which is 92.5 per cent of every dollar ever paid. This parcel sits below its own base flood elevation inside that postcode.
And the storms everybody names are the wrong ones. The September 2024 storm produced 514 claims and about $93.7 million here; the October storm that actually made landfall in this county produced 210 and about $5.0 million, so the one that missed out-paid the landfall nearly nineteen to one. The 2022 hurricane that dominates Florida insurance conversation produced eight claims in this postcode in the whole year.
On schools this address produces something none of the others did. The elementary and middle layers return the same campus, a kindergarten through eighth school, so a child here changes buildings once rather than twice. Eight blocks south the same postcode, the same city and the same downtown draws three entirely different schools. Confirm with the district before you contract.
The best read on who will actually live here is the sponsor's own completed tower. Across its 149 units there are 148 distinct owners, the largest single holding is two units, the sponsor has retained nothing, and 44 per cent are somebody's homesteaded permanent residence. At the nearest luxury tower, where the median unit is over four million dollars, the homestead rate is 67 per cent. That inverts the usual assumption: the more expensive building is the more residential one, and neither has any ownership concentration at all.
What you need to know
Buying pre-construction with someone on your side
Representation costs you nothing and the timing is the catch: in a pre-construction sales gallery your agent generally has to be with you or named at your very first contact for the registration to stand. Sort it out before you call.
The case for it here is that almost nothing is knowable yet. No unit count, no storey count, no declared construction cost, no declaration, no budget and no issued construction permit. A building with that much still unfixed is a contract question before it is a design question, and what happens to your deposit and your price if the schedule moves is answered in the purchase agreement rather than in the gallery.
Know what the statute gives you. On a developer sale you are entitled to the prospectus and the condominium documents, and you have a rescission right measured in days from the later of signing or delivery of those documents. That window is the most valuable thing you have and it closes quickly. Have someone read the declaration, the budget and the reserve schedule inside it.
There is one more thing worth confirming here that would not occur to most buyers. Until the state notifies a developer that its filing is proper, a developer may not close on a contract, and a purchaser's contract is voidable before closing. Whether that notification has been given on this project could not be established from any reachable record. Ask for it in writing.
On deposits the protection is narrower than most buyers assume. The first ten per cent is held in escrow. Above ten per cent the statute permits the developer to use the money for construction once work has begun. We did not search Florida regulatory enforcement records or civil dockets for any builder, developer, contractor or land-holding entity, so read the absence of any such note as unchecked, not clean. Get an independent inspection of your unit before closing, use the one year window afterwards, and read the limited warranty before you sign.
Subdiview is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by KT Sarasota Bay, any homebuilder, any developer of 1000 Boulevard of the Arts, the City of Sarasota, or Sarasota County. The developer is identified here because it is the owner of record in the county property records, which is a statement of fact and not a representation of any relationship. Community names and marks are the property of their respective owners and are used for identification only. Subdiview is operated by a real estate broker licensed in Illinois. We are not your agent, we do not represent you, and we perform no real estate brokerage services in this state. No one at Subdiview is licensed in this state. If you join an interest list, your information is referred to a real estate professional licensed in the state where the property is located, who will contact you directly. We are compensated by that professional's brokerage, not by you. Pricing, plans, inventory, district, tax, flood and approval details on this page carry the dates shown, are as published, proposed or reported rather than committed, and are subject to change without notice.
Questions and answers
1000 Boulevard of the Arts FAQ
What is 1000 Boulevard of the Arts, and where exactly is it?
It is a pre-construction condominium on the site of the former bayfront hotel at 1000 Boulevard of the Arts, about three and a half acres of downtown Sarasota waterfront. One address warning worth carrying: the tax roll gives the site a different street number from everyone else. The city permit record, which holds a hundred permits at this site going back to 1987, the county address layer and the county building footprint all say 1000, and that is the hotel's own historic number. On this site the tax roll is the outlier, which is the reverse of the usual advice. Search 1000, not the roll's number, or you will find two permits instead of a hundred.
The state's filed name trails off mid-sentence. What is it hiding?
Nothing about this building. The state truncates project names at sixty-three characters and the fragment left dangling is a statutory suffix the legislature requires word for word, which appears identically on fifty-nine filings across Florida from Miami to Jacksonville. Read together, those fifty-nine reconstruct the whole phrase. What it does tell you, and this is narrower but real, is that the developer represented to the state that the residential condominium will sit inside a portion of a building rather than occupying the whole structure. It does not establish a master association, a sub-condominium, shared facilities or who controls them, and none of those answers exists in any public record today.
Who is the developer?
Not the entity the state names, on the recorded evidence. The developer of record in the condominium register has never held any interest at this address. Its only property interest anywhere in this county was a commercial unit inside a different tower half a mile away, bought in late 2023 and sold to an affiliate nine months later along with that building's developer rights. A search of the county roll for any parcel held by it returns nothing. The land here is owned by a sibling entity in the same family, which bought it in the summer of 2022. That family has filed four separate condominiums in this county and at least eleven across the state.
Is this part of the Quay?
No, and the recorded chain is specific about it. On one day in July 2022 a single hotel disposition was split into two tracts conveyed to two entities in the same family: this site, and the site of another condominium a few blocks south. The other parcel's own legal description on the tax roll quotes that same instrument. The relationship to the Quay master development amounts to one easement recorded four years later, in the summer of 2026. No master association polygon covers this site, though that layer is thin enough countywide that we treat its silence as weak evidence rather than proof.
Is it in a flood zone?
Yes, and this is where the downtown template fails completely. The federal maps rate this parcel AE, inside the special flood hazard area, with a base flood elevation of eight feet, on a panel that took effect in 2024, and the county's own layer agrees rather than disagreeing for once. Ground across the site runs from roughly the datum at the water's edge to about fifteen feet at the street, with most of the developable area sitting two to three feet below the base flood. The evacuation level is A, a category one zone modelled for a ten foot surge. Eight blocks south, Main Street is out of the special flood hazard area entirely on ground sixteen feet higher, at evacuation level C. Any copy that carries the downtown line to this address is wrong by two zone families and an evacuation level.
How many units, and when will it be finished?
Neither is in a public record. The declaration is not recorded, which we verified four separate ways rather than assuming the state was behind. The city's permit detail screen holds the unit count, storey count and construction value but serves them only to a scripted browser session we could not drive on this project. The demolition permit has been pending inspection for about sixteen months and the master construction permit has been in plan review for about eight months without issuing, so the clock that the local completion benchmarks measure has not really started. The work physically under way on the site today is marine: seawall, dock and boat lift.
Be first in line
Get on the 1000 Boulevard of the Arts interest list
We will connect you with a real estate professional licensed in Florida who represents you rather than the seller, who can register you before your first contact with the sales gallery, and who will get you the answers this page could not: the unit and storey count, which entity will be the selling developer, the construction permit status and a real occupancy target, what the residential condominium shares with the rest of the building and who controls it, the prospectus and condominium documents, and pricing as soon as it exists.
It costs nothing, creates no brokerage relationship by itself, and does not obligate you to anything.