Coming soon in Coconut Grove, Miami, FL
Opus Coconut Grove
3127 SW 27 Avenue, north Coconut Grove, City of Miami
The site is still a recorded 1982 condominium of six units, and the new one cannot legally exist until that is terminated. At fourteen units it falls below the threshold that would require a prospectus. It also sits on the highest ground we have measured in Miami. The whole record is below.
- Address
- 3127 SW 27 Avenue
- Area
- Coconut Grove, Miami
- Tax rate
- 19.9544 mills
- Ground elevation
- About 18 feet
At a glance
Opus fast facts
Every figure below is read from the state condominium filing, the county appraiser's own folio records and tax tool, the city permit record, the federal flood and claim files, or the county's hazard layers with bayfront and downtown controls behind each result. Where a number does not exist yet, or could not be confirmed, we say so plainly.
- Record address
- 3127 SW 27 Avenue, Miami, FL 33133
- Filed as
- Opus Coconut Grove, Condominium
- Area
- North Coconut Grove, City of Miami
- The site today
- Still a recorded 1982 condominium
- Tax rate
- 19.9544 mills, outside the downtown district
- Non-ad-valorem on the site now
- $380.00, not zero
- Marketed unit count
- 14, which is below two statutory thresholds
- Prospectus required
- No, at that unit count
- Flood zone
- X, no base flood elevation
- Ground elevation
- About 18 feet, the highest we have measured
- First milestone inspection
- 25 years, about 2054
- Neighbourhood homestead rate
- About 46 percent, unlike the towers
- Pricing and release dates
- Not published yet
- Association dues and reserves
- Not a public record at any stage
Not published yet
Not published yet
Location: see 3127 SW 27 Avenue on the map. Figures carry the dates shown and are subject to change.
What almost nobody checks
There is already a condominium here, and the new one cannot exist until it is killed
Every other pre-construction page we have built starts from one vacant parcel. This one does not. The site is six separately assessed condominium units from 1982, about 1,602 square feet each, all owned by the developer's entity, and all still showing as active on the current roll. The buildings were demolished last autumn. The structures are gone and the condominium is not.
That is a legal obstacle rather than a formality. A new declaration cannot be recorded over an existing condominium until the old one is formally terminated by a recorded plan of termination. We could not confirm from any public record that this termination has been recorded, and the six folios remain active. Until that changes, the new condominium legally cannot come into existence, no matter how far the construction gets.
We are not suggesting anything is wrong. Terminating a wholly owned six-unit condominium is straightforward when one entity owns all six, and the developer owns all six. But it is the single largest open item on this page, and it is the first thing any buyer should ask for by name: the recorded plan of termination. Do not accept a verbal assurance that it is handled.
Meanwhile the county is billing the buildings that came down. The current roll still assesses the six demolished structures at about $809,602 each, and the site carries about $99,210.72 a year in total. Spread across the fourteen residences the project is marketed at, that is about $7,086 per future home per year. That is not your bill, and it will not be. It is what the developer pays to wait, which is useful context for a negotiation.
There is a nice irony in the building that was here. It was a 44-year-old condominium that was demolished having never once been required to recertify, because at two storeys it fell outside the programme. Its neighbours on either side have recertification records; it has none. Its replacement will be inspected every ten years after its first milestone. The building that got no scrutiny is gone and the one that gets all of it is coming.
One more thing about the timetable, because the marketing number is not achievable. Marketing points at 2027. The two most recent comparable condominiums in this neighbourhood took about 1,253 and 1,238 days from permit to certificate of occupancy, a mean of about 41 months, which from this permit lands around late 2029. That is roughly eighteen months later than advertised, and it is derived from the two nearest completed projects rather than from a rule of thumb.
Take these four to the sales office: the recorded plan of termination for the existing condominium; the confirmed unit count, unit mix and storey count, since fourteen is a marketing number and it drives everything below; the proposed association budget and reserve schedule; and the contract's delay provisions measured against a 2029 completion rather than a 2027 one.
What this actually costs
Twenty mills, an exemption worth less the higher you go, and a waste fee that follows the kerb
The rate is the plain City of Miami rate and the downtown levy is nowhere near. Total 19.9544 mills across nine authorities: county at 5.2489, city at 7.1080, city debt at 0.2536, school board at 6.6230, children's trust at 0.4638 and the water and navigation levies. The downtown development district boundary is about 3.1 miles away and returns nothing here, against a control that returns a hit.
On non-ad-valorem this page corrects two of our own earlier ones. We have written that a City of Miami condominium unit carries no non-ad-valorem assessment. This site carries $380.00 today. The charge follows kerbside collection form rather than tenure: a single-family house pays $380, a duplex $760, a six-unit townhouse condominium $380 per unit, and the 23-unit stacked building directly across the street pays nothing at all.
So the forecast for a finished building here is zero, with a caveat. A stacked building with shared collection falls outside the fee, which is why the neighbour pays nothing, and that is the expected outcome here. But it is a forecast derived from the neighbour rather than a fact about this building. Get it confirmed in writing. On two other Miami pages in this series the general rule turned out not to hold at the specific address.
The full annual figure, on the nearest completed comparable. At the median unit value in the 2021-completed building across the street, about $1,150,524, the bill is about $22,958.02 without homestead and about $22,125.87 with it. On a size-matched comparable the median runs closer to about $28,585, and at the marketed top price it would be about $57,868. Publish the range rather than one number, because unit size in a fourteen-unit boutique building varies enormously.
The exemption does very little at this price point and that is worth stating. Homestead saves a flat $832.15 at every unit value, which is about 5.15 per cent of the bill at the low end of the range and about 1.44 per cent at the marketed top. It is a fixed dollar exemption against a flat rate, so it shrinks as a share of the bill as the unit gets dearer. Do not let a carrying-cost estimate lean on it.
And the usual arithmetic warning, which we verify against the roll rather than assert. The second homestead exemption does not reach school levies. Applying a flat fifty thousand to every levy overstates the saving by about $146.76. Nearly every online estimator makes that error.
What this page cannot price is the part that will cost the most. No association dues figure, reserve balance, insurance premium or special assessment history exists in any public record for any Florida condominium before its declaration records, and on a fourteen-unit building the per-owner share of a roof, a lift or a facade is carried by very few people. On a building this small that number will very likely exceed the tax line, and at fourteen units the association never has to publish it.
The practical version: the tax is computable to the dollar and unremarkable. The waste fee should go to zero but is not zero today. The association is unknowable from outside, will never be required to publish anything, and is the number that decides whether this is affordable. Ask for the budget and the reserve schedule in writing and read them inside your rescission window.
The compliance clock
Fourteen units is below two disclosure thresholds, and one of them is the prospectus
Since the Surfside collapse Florida has built a hard timetable around structural inspection and reserve funding, and a new building sits at the start of it. On this page the more consequential clock is not about structure at all. It is about what the developer and the association are ever required to tell you, and at fourteen units the answer is unusually little.
Start with the disclosure thresholds, because they are set by unit count. At the marketed fourteen units this condominium sits above the threshold where developer disclosure obligations begin at all, but below the threshold that would require a full prospectus, and below the twenty-five-unit threshold that would compel the association to maintain a website and post its budget, contracts, insurance and inspection reports.
Read what that second one means over the life of the building. The structural integrity reserve study and the milestone inspection reports for this building would never have to be posted anywhere, even for owners. They would exist, and an owner could demand them through the record-access route, but nothing compels them into the open. The 23-unit building across the street is also below the line; a 26-unit building nearby is above it. Two units decide whether a condominium is transparent by default.
So the single number that matters most on this page is the one we cannot confirm. Fourteen is a marketing figure. If the recorded declaration comes in at twenty or at twenty-five, the disclosure regime changes materially in the buyer's favour. Ask for the confirmed unit count in writing and understand that it is a legal fact, not a design detail.
The structural clocks themselves are straightforward here. The site is about 1,396 feet from Biscayne Bay, comfortably inside the three-mile coastal band, so the twenty-five-year milestone inspection trigger applies rather than thirty. On a completion around 2029 the first milestone inspection falls in about 2054. The first reserve study runs ten years from the condominium's creation, and no condominium exists yet.
The turnover position is the same as everywhere and is consistently misunderstood. At turnover the developer must deliver an accountant's audit, two sealed engineering reports and the reserve study, and there is no obligation in that section to fund the reserve at any level or to make good a shortfall. On a fourteen-owner building the gap, whatever it is, is divided fourteen ways.
And here is what a buyer cannot see before contracting. The record-access right that produces reserve studies and inspection reports runs to unit owners. The estoppel certificate runs to an owner, a mortgagee or their designee. A prospective purchaser is none of those, and here there are no owners yet to ask. The documents you receive on a developer sale, inside your rescission window, are the whole of it.
One correction to something we assumed earlier in this series, because it changes how to read any of these pages. A recorded declaration is not a signal that a project is closing out. In this neighbourhood one project recorded its declaration four years before the building was finished, and the two most recent comparables recorded about 309 and 447 days before their certificates of occupancy. Recording is a financing and sales event, not a completion event.
What to demand in writing before your rescission period closes: the recorded plan of termination for the old condominium; the confirmed unit count, because it decides your disclosure rights; the proposed budget with its reserve schedule; whether the association will voluntarily publish its records despite not being required to; and the developer's position on funding reserves before turnover.
Get notified when the old condominium is terminated
Nothing new can be recorded here until it is.
The area
The highest ground in the series, in the postcode with the worst flood record
This address contains the sharpest contrast we have found anywhere in Miami. The parcel is in flood zone X with no base flood elevation, on an effective panel dated 2009, and ground elevation derives to about 18 feet. That is the highest of any site in this series: the Coconut Grove bayfront comes back at about 4 feet, a mid-city site at about 9.5 and Brickell at about 1.4. This is the Atlantic coastal ridge at close to its highest point in the county.
The margins around it are measurable rather than vague. The nearest mandated hazard zone is about 840 feet away, with a base flood elevation of 12 feet, and the nearest velocity zones are about 1,221 and 1,400 feet away at 15 and 16 feet. The site takes no surge at any category and no inundation on any published sea level rise surface, while the bayfront control is wet from a category two and from four feet of rise.
And yet the postcode has the worst flood claim record in this entire series. This postcode has paid about $61,831,445 across 1,417 federal flood insurance claims, which is roughly 113 times a nearby inland postcode and about 8 times Brickell's. That money is real, and almost none of it is from up here. It is from the streets between this ridge and the water, which is a quarter of a mile away and about fourteen feet lower.
One number from that record deserves attention anyway. About 161 of those claims, roughly 11.4 per cent, were rated outside the mandated hazard zone entirely. Being in zone X is not the same as being dry, and one paid claim in nine in this postcode came from a property that was never required to carry the cover. Price flood insurance on its own merits here rather than skipping it because no lender demands it.
The household storm record separates wind from water as cleanly as anywhere. About 9,741 federal assistance registrations in this postcode, of which about 98.4 per cent record no flood damage at all, and about 9,335 are attributed to hurricane wind. Total household assistance is about $6.6 million, of which about $792,001 is flood. The average award is about $677.
There is one contradiction in the county's own layers that we will not paper over. The evacuation layer returns zone A, a category one zone, for this address, sharing a surge model cell with the bayfront. The coastal high hazard area layer returns nothing here, and both layers are positively controlled at other addresses. A site eighteen feet up is not plausibly a category one evacuation zone; the model cell is simply coarse. Follow the evacuation order anyway, and understand which of the two numbers describes your building.
On ownership, Coconut Grove is a different market from the towers and the numbers say so plainly. Across 290 completed comparable units, about 45.86 per cent carry homestead and just two owners, about 0.69 per cent, mail to a foreign address. The 2021 building across the street runs about 39.13 per cent homesteaded and only about 17.39 per cent entity-owned. Against a Brickell tower at under 18 per cent homesteaded and a barrier-island building at under 7, this is a neighbourhood where people actually live in the condominiums.
That gradient runs opposite to the one we found on the Coral Gables fringe, where entity ownership was higher and homestead lower. If you are buying to live in it rather than to hold it, this is the submarket in the county where your neighbours are most likely to be doing the same. On schools, the address assigns to a Coconut Grove elementary, a middle school and Coral Gables Senior High; confirm with the district, since the published boundary layers carry older modification dates.
What you need to know
Buying pre-construction with someone on your side
Representation costs you nothing and the timing is the catch: in a pre-construction sales gallery your agent generally has to be with you or named at your very first contact for the registration to stand. Sort it out before you call.
The case for it here is sharper than on any other page in this series. At fourteen units no prospectus is required and the association will never have to publish anything. The documents you are handed at contract, inside a short rescission window, are close to the entirety of what you will ever be given without asking. Somebody experienced should be reading them, and asking for what is missing.
The second is the termination. The site is still a recorded 1982 condominium and no new declaration can be recorded until that is formally terminated. We could not confirm it has been. That is a title question as much as a sales question, and it should be answered by a recorded document rather than by a salesperson.
The third is the calendar. Marketing points at 2027 and the two nearest completed comparables took about 41 months from permit to certificate of occupancy, which lands this around late 2029. Get the delay provisions read, and understand what happens to your deposit if the date moves by two years.
On deposits the protection is narrower than most buyers assume. The first ten per cent is held in escrow. Above ten per cent the statute permits the developer to use the money for construction once work has begun, and work has begun here. We did not search Florida regulatory enforcement records or civil dockets for any builder, developer, contractor or land-holding entity, so read the absence of any such note as unchecked, not clean.
The rest is specific to a small building: get an independent inspection of your unit before closing and use the one-year window afterwards while the developer is still responsible. Ask what design wind speed and opening protection the plans are sealed to. Ask how the lift, the roof and the facade are scheduled in the reserve study, because on fourteen owners those three items are the whole risk. Read the limited warranty before you sign.
Subdiview is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Harbour 3127, any homebuilder, any developer of Opus, the City of Miami, or Miami-Dade County. The developer is identified here because it is the developer of record in the state condominium filing, which is a statement of fact and not a representation of any relationship. Community names and marks are the property of their respective owners and are used for identification only. Subdiview is operated by a real estate broker licensed in Illinois. We are not your agent, we do not represent you, and we perform no real estate brokerage services in this state. No one at Subdiview is licensed in this state. If you join an interest list, your information is referred to a real estate professional licensed in the state where the property is located, who will contact you directly. We are compensated by that professional's brokerage, not by you. Pricing, plans, inventory, district, tax, flood and approval details on this page carry the dates shown, are as published, proposed or reported rather than committed, and are subject to change without notice.
Questions and answers
Opus FAQ
What is Opus Coconut Grove, and what is the address?
It is a boutique condominium planned for 3127 SW 27 Avenue in north Coconut Grove, City of Miami. It is filed with the state under the legal name Opus Coconut Grove, Condominium, and the developer of record is Harbour 3127, whose entire Florida programme is two unrecorded filings run from one Coconut Grove office. A master construction permit scoped as multi-family condominium, about 57,856 square feet at about $18,000,000, was issued in the spring and is active, with an electrical trade permit issued a week ago and no certificate of occupancy.
Is the site really still an old condominium?
Yes, and this is the most important thing on the page. The parcel is not one vacant folio. It is six separately assessed condominium units from 1982, about 1,602 square feet each, all owned by the developer's entity, and all still showing as active on the roll. The buildings were demolished last autumn. Under Florida law a new declaration cannot be recorded over the top of an existing condominium until that condominium is formally terminated, and we could not confirm from a public record that the termination has been recorded. Until it is, the new condominium legally cannot come into existence. Ask for the recorded plan of termination by name.
What does the site cost to hold right now?
About $99,210.72 a year, and it is being billed on buildings that no longer exist. The 2026 roll still assesses the six demolished structures at about $809,602 each. Spread across the fourteen residences the project is marketed at, that is about $7,086 per future home per year of carrying cost while nothing is standing. That is not your bill and it will not be, but it tells you what the developer is paying to wait, which is worth knowing when you negotiate.
Will a unit here pay any assessments on top of the tax?
Probably not, but the current answer is not zero and the reason is interesting. The site today carries a $380 city waste fee. That charge follows kerbside form rather than ownership type: a single-family house pays $380, a duplex $760, a six-unit townhouse condominium $380 per unit, and the 23-unit building across the street pays nothing. A stacked building with shared collection falls outside it, so the expected answer for a finished building here is zero. Get it confirmed rather than assumed, because on two of our other Miami pages the county-wide rule turned out not to hold.
Does the small unit count change my legal protections?
Yes, and not in your favour. At the marketed fourteen units this condominium sits above the threshold where the developer disclosure rules begin, but below the threshold that would require a full prospectus, and below the twenty-five-unit threshold that would compel the association to maintain a website and post its budget, contracts, insurance and inspection reports. So the structural integrity reserve study and the milestone inspection reports for this building would never have to be published, even to owners. Smaller is more intimate and it is also less transparent, by operation of law.
Is it in a flood zone?
No, and the margin is larger than anywhere else we have measured. The parcel is in zone X with no base flood elevation on an effective panel dated 2009, and the nearest mandated hazard zone is about 840 feet away, with velocity zones at about 1,221 and 1,400 feet. Ground elevation derives to about 18 feet, which is the highest of any site in this series: the Coconut Grove bayfront comes back at about 4 feet and Brickell at about 1.4. The site takes no surge at any category and no inundation on any published sea level rise surface. This is the ridge, and it is the whole reason this part of the Grove exists where it does.
Be first in line
Get on the Opus interest list
We will connect you with a real estate professional licensed in Florida who represents you rather than the seller, who can register you before your first contact with the sales gallery, and who will get you the answers this page could not: the recorded plan of termination for the existing condominium, the confirmed unit count and what it does to your disclosure rights, the proposed budget and reserve schedule, the waste fee position on a finished building, the real completion timetable, and pricing as soon as it exists.
It costs nothing, creates no brokerage relationship by itself, and does not obligate you to anything.